Макрорегион, мезорегион или административно-территориальная единица: поиски «родного края» в учебных пособиях по региональной истории России
Saved in:
| Title: | Макрорегион, мезорегион или административно-территориальная единица: поиски «родного края» в учебных пособиях по региональной истории России |
|---|---|
| Source: | Гуманитарные исследования в Восточной Сибири и на Дальнем Востоке, Iss 2 (2025) |
| Publisher Information: | Far Eastern Federal University, 2025. |
| Publication Year: | 2025 |
| Subject Terms: | GN301-674, Archaeology, D1-2009, мезорегион, родной край, History (General), школьный учебник, самопрезентация региона, региональная история, макрорегион, CC1-960, Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropology |
| Description: | Based on the analysis of the titles of 340 late-Soviet regional history textbooks, this article explores how the boundaries of the «native land» were articulated by various regions of the RSFSR depending on their self-presentation strategies. The author categorizes the diverse naming approaches into three groups: 1) generic-functional titles, 2) titles referencing specific administrative-territorial units, and 3) titles appealing to historical-geographical categories (macro/mesoregional level). The study concludes that during the Soviet era most regional history textbooks fell into the first two categories, while the post-Soviet period saw a rise in textbooks focusing on meso- and macroregions. |
| Document Type: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| ISSN: | 2076-8575 1997-2857 |
| DOI: | 10.24866/1997-2857/2025-2/70-78 |
| Access URL: | https://doaj.org/article/fee1f7c195514efb94c3a04eb68184fa |
| Accession Number: | edsair.doi.dedup.....8f9fca4125afd8746ddc9001791ba46d |
| Database: | OpenAIRE |
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science | Abstract: | Based on the analysis of the titles of 340 late-Soviet regional history textbooks, this article explores how the boundaries of the «native land» were articulated by various regions of the RSFSR depending on their self-presentation strategies. The author categorizes the diverse naming approaches into three groups: 1) generic-functional titles, 2) titles referencing specific administrative-territorial units, and 3) titles appealing to historical-geographical categories (macro/mesoregional level). The study concludes that during the Soviet era most regional history textbooks fell into the first two categories, while the post-Soviet period saw a rise in textbooks focusing on meso- and macroregions. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 20768575 19972857 |
| DOI: | 10.24866/1997-2857/2025-2/70-78 |