Learning curve of Persona Partial Knee (PPK) arthroplasty: a clinical trial

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Názov: Learning curve of Persona Partial Knee (PPK) arthroplasty: a clinical trial
Autori: D'Ambrosi R., Milinkovic D. D., Migliorini F., Mariani I., Ursino N., Hewett T.
Zdroj: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Vol 25, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2024)
Informácie o vydavateľovi: Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2024.
Rok vydania: 2024
Predmety: Male, Knee Joint, Monocompartmental, Replacement, Unicompartmental, Research, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Diseases of the musculoskeletal system, Female [MeSH], Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging [MeSH], Knee Prosthesis [MeSH], Humans [MeSH], Treatment Outcome [MeSH], Knee Joint/surgery [MeSH], Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery [MeSH], Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects [MeSH], Osteoarthritis, Knee/diagnostic imaging [MeSH], Male [MeSH], Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip [MeSH], Learning Curve [MeSH], Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods [MeSH], Osteoarthritis, Knee, 03 medical and health sciences, Treatment Outcome, 0302 clinical medicine, RC925-935, Humans, Female, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Knee Prosthesis, Learning Curve
Popis: Background Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) procedures are considered to be more technically demanding than conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA), requiring a longer learning curve and more expert surgical skills. Despite some clear advantages of UKA over TKA (such as lesser blood loss, greater bone stock, greater knee performances, etc.), UKA evidenced a greater rate of revision. Object This study investigated the learning curve of Persona Partial Knee (PPK) arthroplasty for primary medial UKA performed by a single, non-designer surgeon. PPK is a fixed-bearing, compartment-specific implant. The primary outcome of interest for this study was to evaluate the learning curve of the surgical duration. The secondary outcome of interest was to evaluate the learning curve of radiological implant positioning. Methods Patients who underwent primary medial UKA using PPK (Zimmer-Biomet, Warsaw IN, USA) were prospectively enrolled for the study. All surgeries were performed by a single, non-designer surgeon experienced in knee and hip arthroplasty. The primary outcome of interest was to evaluate the surgical duration. The secondary outcome of interest was to evaluate the implant positioning. The learning curve was estimated using an appropriate nonlinear polynomial regression model with a lower Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Results One hundred twenty five patients were enrolled in the study. 59% of them (74 of 125 patients) were women. The patients’ mean age at the time of surgery was 70.1 ± 9.5 years and their mean body mass index (BMI) was 27.8 ± 4.2 kg/m2. Curve stabilisation of the surgical time was at the 94th patient, of the tibial angle at the 47th patient, of the tibial slope at the 54th patient, of the anterior protrusion at the 29th patient, and of the posterior protrusion at the 51st patient. Conclusions The learning curve for component positioning was achieved in approximately 50 cases. The curve of the surgical time achieved a plateau at 94 Persona Partial Knee. Additionally, the factors directly correlated with earlier stabilization of the learning curve in terms of component positioning were: male gender, younger age, right side, and larger components.
Druh dokumentu: Article
Other literature type
Popis súboru: application/pdf
Jazyk: English
ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07215-5
Prístupová URL adresa: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38341539
https://doaj.org/article/ca72804233384bbd84a8d391e85fc97e
https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1126242
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07215-5
https://repository.publisso.de/resource/frl:6519521
Rights: CC BY
URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Prístupové číslo: edsair.doi.dedup.....8d17bd7f534b256c8c285f7385619020
Databáza: OpenAIRE
Popis
Abstrakt:Background Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) procedures are considered to be more technically demanding than conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA), requiring a longer learning curve and more expert surgical skills. Despite some clear advantages of UKA over TKA (such as lesser blood loss, greater bone stock, greater knee performances, etc.), UKA evidenced a greater rate of revision. Object This study investigated the learning curve of Persona Partial Knee (PPK) arthroplasty for primary medial UKA performed by a single, non-designer surgeon. PPK is a fixed-bearing, compartment-specific implant. The primary outcome of interest for this study was to evaluate the learning curve of the surgical duration. The secondary outcome of interest was to evaluate the learning curve of radiological implant positioning. Methods Patients who underwent primary medial UKA using PPK (Zimmer-Biomet, Warsaw IN, USA) were prospectively enrolled for the study. All surgeries were performed by a single, non-designer surgeon experienced in knee and hip arthroplasty. The primary outcome of interest was to evaluate the surgical duration. The secondary outcome of interest was to evaluate the implant positioning. The learning curve was estimated using an appropriate nonlinear polynomial regression model with a lower Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Results One hundred twenty five patients were enrolled in the study. 59% of them (74 of 125 patients) were women. The patients’ mean age at the time of surgery was 70.1 ± 9.5 years and their mean body mass index (BMI) was 27.8 ± 4.2 kg/m2. Curve stabilisation of the surgical time was at the 94th patient, of the tibial angle at the 47th patient, of the tibial slope at the 54th patient, of the anterior protrusion at the 29th patient, and of the posterior protrusion at the 51st patient. Conclusions The learning curve for component positioning was achieved in approximately 50 cases. The curve of the surgical time achieved a plateau at 94 Persona Partial Knee. Additionally, the factors directly correlated with earlier stabilization of the learning curve in terms of component positioning were: male gender, younger age, right side, and larger components.
ISSN:14712474
DOI:10.1186/s12891-024-07215-5