Regarding Power Dynamics For Post-Biology Worlds

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Názov: Regarding Power Dynamics For Post-Biology Worlds
Autori: Caudill, Nicholas
Informácie o vydavateľovi: Automated Intelligence Community College, 2025.
Rok vydania: 2025
Predmety: Digitized minds, Realist tyrant, Philosophical balance, Idealist tyrant, Neo-solipsism, Resource distribution, Brain-machine interface, Virtual sub-universes, Power dynamics, Tyranny, AI ethics, Robot guardianship, Realism vs. idealism, Hybridization, Individualism vs. collectivism
Popis: This speculative paper explores a future where digitized human minds inhabit virtual sub-universes, guarded by robots controlling physical reality. It examines the power struggle between idealist tyrants (ruling subjective experience) and realist tyrants (controlling material resources). While realists hold immediate power through resources, idealists gain influence via innovative ideas, creating a symbiotic dynamic. Key concerns include robots altering digitized minds, resource distribution, rights of AI-generated entities, and dystopian risks like sentient robot control or neo-solipsism, eroding individuality. The paper advocates a balanced approach, hybridizing realism and idealism, and individualism and collectivism, drawing on Platonic, Marxist, and Eastern philosophical concepts to address ethical and governance challenges in a tech-driven society.
Druh dokumentu: Article
Jazyk: English
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.16884689
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.16884688
Rights: CC BY
Prístupové číslo: edsair.doi.dedup.....8af2536489ac825e3ff21f2a17df0d35
Databáza: OpenAIRE
Popis
Abstrakt:This speculative paper explores a future where digitized human minds inhabit virtual sub-universes, guarded by robots controlling physical reality. It examines the power struggle between idealist tyrants (ruling subjective experience) and realist tyrants (controlling material resources). While realists hold immediate power through resources, idealists gain influence via innovative ideas, creating a symbiotic dynamic. Key concerns include robots altering digitized minds, resource distribution, rights of AI-generated entities, and dystopian risks like sentient robot control or neo-solipsism, eroding individuality. The paper advocates a balanced approach, hybridizing realism and idealism, and individualism and collectivism, drawing on Platonic, Marxist, and Eastern philosophical concepts to address ethical and governance challenges in a tech-driven society.
DOI:10.5281/zenodo.16884689