Value of concerted and hospital hemodialysis through a multi-criteria decision analysis
Uloženo v:
| Název: | Value of concerted and hospital hemodialysis through a multi-criteria decision analysis |
|---|---|
| Autoři: | Caro Martínez, Araceli, Valcárcel Cabrera, María Del Carmen, Olry-de-Labry-Lima, Antonio |
| Přispěvatelé: | [Caro Martínez,A, Valcárcel Cabrera,MDC, Orly-de-Labry-Lima,A] Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública, Granada, Spain, [Caro Martínez,A ] Programa de Doctorado Interuniversitario en Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Jaén-Universidad de Sevilla (UJA-US), Sevilla, Spain, [Olry-de-Labry-Lima,A] Centro Andaluz de Documentación e Información de Medicamentos (CADIME), Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública, Granada, Spain, [Olry-de-Labry-Lima,A] Consorcio de Investigación Biomédica en Red Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP, [Olry-de-Labry-Lima,A] Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain, Vifor Pharma |
| Zdroj: | RISalud-ANDALUCIA. Repositorio Institucional de Salud de Andalucía Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca Nefrología (English Edition), Vol 43, Iss 6, Pp 742-749 (2023) |
| Informace o vydavateli: | Elsevier BV, 2023. |
| Rok vydání: | 2023 |
| Témata: | Servicios externos, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Decision Making, Diálisis, Outsourced Services, 16. Peace & justice, Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology, Decision Support Techniques, 3. Good health, Evaluación de la tecnología biomédica, Evaluación de tecnologías sanitarias, Toma de Decisiones, Renal Dialysis, Spain, Humans, RC870-923, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Servicios Externos, Dialysis, Toma de decisiones |
| Popis: | To evaluate the value of the provision of contracted versus hospital dialysis services for the treatment of chronic kidney disease in Spain using the multicriteria decision analysis methodology.The EVIDEM (Evidence and Value: Impact on Decision Making) evaluation framework was used to calculate the estimated value of both dialysis delivery models (arranged vs. hospital) through a virtual workshop in which different profiles participated: directors and managers, professionals and heads of units and representatives of patients and relatives. The scores were combined using an additive lineal model, which combined the weight of the model with the individual score of the criteria, and each value was transformed to a scale between 0 and 1.The estimated value for arranged dialysis was 0.29 (DS: ±0.2) and 0.39 (DS: ±0.2) for hospital dialysis. All profiles gave a higher value to hospital hemodialysis compared to contracted hemodialysis. The highest value for hospital dialysis was for patients (0.44), with the lowest mean value for directors (0.36) and the range for arranged dialysis being between patients (0.31) and intermediate positions (0.27).Hospital hemodialysis obtained a higher value than concerted dialysis. In general, the panelists affirmed that it is a useful and interesting exercise and that, to a certain extent, it provides security in decision-making, since it allows ordering, rationalizing and considering, in an explicit and transparent manner, the different criteria involved. |
| Druh dokumentu: | Article |
| Popis souboru: | application/pdf; application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
| Jazyk: | English |
| ISSN: | 2013-2514 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.nefroe.2024.01.001 |
| Přístupová URL adresa: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38246811 https://hdl.handle.net/10668/23299 https://doaj.org/article/f16122e6663a4227aeea55dd498b7996 |
| Rights: | CC BY NC ND |
| Přístupové číslo: | edsair.doi.dedup.....8704bba2fc9d07e053b002f6de0dae33 |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Full Text Finder 
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science | Abstrakt: | To evaluate the value of the provision of contracted versus hospital dialysis services for the treatment of chronic kidney disease in Spain using the multicriteria decision analysis methodology.The EVIDEM (Evidence and Value: Impact on Decision Making) evaluation framework was used to calculate the estimated value of both dialysis delivery models (arranged vs. hospital) through a virtual workshop in which different profiles participated: directors and managers, professionals and heads of units and representatives of patients and relatives. The scores were combined using an additive lineal model, which combined the weight of the model with the individual score of the criteria, and each value was transformed to a scale between 0 and 1.The estimated value for arranged dialysis was 0.29 (DS: ±0.2) and 0.39 (DS: ±0.2) for hospital dialysis. All profiles gave a higher value to hospital hemodialysis compared to contracted hemodialysis. The highest value for hospital dialysis was for patients (0.44), with the lowest mean value for directors (0.36) and the range for arranged dialysis being between patients (0.31) and intermediate positions (0.27).Hospital hemodialysis obtained a higher value than concerted dialysis. In general, the panelists affirmed that it is a useful and interesting exercise and that, to a certain extent, it provides security in decision-making, since it allows ordering, rationalizing and considering, in an explicit and transparent manner, the different criteria involved. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 20132514 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.nefroe.2024.01.001 |