LA PROTECCIÓN JURÍDICO CONCURRENCIAL DE LA PROPIEDAD INDUSTRIAL
Saved in:
| Title: | LA PROTECCIÓN JURÍDICO CONCURRENCIAL DE LA PROPIEDAD INDUSTRIAL |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Massaguer Fuentes, José |
| Contributors: | Departamentos de la UMH::Ciencias Sociales y Humanas |
| Source: | REDIUMH. Depósito Digital de la UMH Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche |
| Publisher Information: | Universidad Miguel Hernandez de Elche, 2025. |
| Publication Year: | 2025 |
| Subject Terms: | Unfair competition, CDU::3 - Ciencias sociales, Unfair imitation and confusion, Competencia desleal, Imitación y confusión desleales, Propiedad industrial, Industrial property |
| Description: | One of the topics covered in the Law against Unfair Competition is the application of the prohibition of unfair competition to practices consisting of the exploitation of products, services and distinctive signs protectable by industrial property rights, both in cases where they have not been protected and in those where they are in fact protected at the time the challenged practice is carried out, or where they were protected in the past. Case law has addressed this matter in accordance with the so-called “principle of relative complementarity,” initially proposed by a segment of the Scholars. This paper is dedicated to studying the legal basis of this principle, its formulation, its implications and limits, as well as the most notable groups of cases. |
| Document Type: | Article |
| File Description: | application/pdf |
| ISSN: | 2445-0936 |
| DOI: | 10.21134/afe92546 |
| Access URL: | https://hdl.handle.net/11000/37366 |
| Rights: | CC BY NC SA CC BY NC ND |
| Accession Number: | edsair.doi.dedup.....8076f8cf1169b80a4d2faab3fb15e018 |
| Database: | OpenAIRE |
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science | Abstract: | One of the topics covered in the Law against Unfair Competition is the application of the prohibition of unfair competition to practices consisting of the exploitation of products, services and distinctive signs protectable by industrial property rights, both in cases where they have not been protected and in those where they are in fact protected at the time the challenged practice is carried out, or where they were protected in the past. Case law has addressed this matter in accordance with the so-called “principle of relative complementarity,” initially proposed by a segment of the Scholars. This paper is dedicated to studying the legal basis of this principle, its formulation, its implications and limits, as well as the most notable groups of cases. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 24450936 |
| DOI: | 10.21134/afe92546 |