Flexible Bayesian Multiple Comparison Adjustment Using Dirichlet Process and Beta-Binomial Model Priors
Saved in:
| Title: | Flexible Bayesian Multiple Comparison Adjustment Using Dirichlet Process and Beta-Binomial Model Priors |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Don van den Bergh, Fabian Dablander |
| Source: | The American Statistician. :1-23 |
| Publication Status: | Preprint |
| Publisher Information: | Informa UK Limited, 2025. |
| Publication Year: | 2025 |
| Subject Terms: | Methodology (stat.ME), FOS: Computer and information sciences, 05 social sciences, FOS: Mathematics, Mathematics - Statistics Theory, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences, Statistics Theory (math.ST), 0101 mathematics, 62F15 (Primary) 62P15 (Secondary), 01 natural sciences, Statistics - Methodology |
| Description: | Researchers frequently wish to assess the equality or inequality of groups, but this poses the challenge of adequately adjusting for multiple comparisons. Statistically, all possible configurations of equality and inequality constraints can be uniquely represented as partitions of groups, where any number of groups are equal if they are in the same subset of the partition. In a Bayesian framework, one can adjust for multiple comparisons by constructing a suitable prior distribution over all possible partitions. Inspired by work on variable selection in regression, we propose a class of flexible beta-binomial priors for multiple comparison adjustment. We compare this prior setup to the Dirichlet process prior suggested by Gopalan and Berry (1998) and multiple comparison adjustment methods that do not specify a prior over partitions directly. Our approach not only allows researchers to assess pairwise equality constraints but simultaneously all possible equalities among all groups. Since the space of possible partitions grows rapidly -- for ten groups, there are already 115,975 possible partitions -- we use a stochastic search algorithm to efficiently explore the space. Our method is implemented in the Julia package EqualitySampler, and we illustrate it on examples related to the comparison of means, standard deviations, and proportions. 31 pages, 12 figures, and 2 tables |
| Document Type: | Article Other literature type |
| Language: | English |
| ISSN: | 1537-2731 0003-1305 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/00031305.2025.2561146 |
| DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2208.07086 |
| DOI: | 10.6084/m9.figshare.30142509.v1 |
| DOI: | 10.6084/m9.figshare.30142509 |
| Access URL: | http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.07086 |
| Rights: | CC BY CC BY SA |
| Accession Number: | edsair.doi.dedup.....7bc52072c57896a2c21520e516f6ae99 |
| Database: | OpenAIRE |
| Abstract: | Researchers frequently wish to assess the equality or inequality of groups, but this poses the challenge of adequately adjusting for multiple comparisons. Statistically, all possible configurations of equality and inequality constraints can be uniquely represented as partitions of groups, where any number of groups are equal if they are in the same subset of the partition. In a Bayesian framework, one can adjust for multiple comparisons by constructing a suitable prior distribution over all possible partitions. Inspired by work on variable selection in regression, we propose a class of flexible beta-binomial priors for multiple comparison adjustment. We compare this prior setup to the Dirichlet process prior suggested by Gopalan and Berry (1998) and multiple comparison adjustment methods that do not specify a prior over partitions directly. Our approach not only allows researchers to assess pairwise equality constraints but simultaneously all possible equalities among all groups. Since the space of possible partitions grows rapidly -- for ten groups, there are already 115,975 possible partitions -- we use a stochastic search algorithm to efficiently explore the space. Our method is implemented in the Julia package EqualitySampler, and we illustrate it on examples related to the comparison of means, standard deviations, and proportions.<br />31 pages, 12 figures, and 2 tables |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 15372731 00031305 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/00031305.2025.2561146 |
Full Text Finder
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science