Perch selection of three species of kingfishers at the Pantanal of Brazil

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Názov: Perch selection of three species of kingfishers at the Pantanal of Brazil
Autori: L. C. Peinado, Z. Ortega
Prispievatelia: Zoologia, Facultad de Ciencias Biologicas y Ambientales
Zdroj: BULERIA. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de León
Universidad de León
Digibug. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Granada
Universidad de Granada (UGR)
Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol 46, Iss 1, Pp 99-109 (2023)
Informácie o vydavateľovi: Consorci del Museu de Ciencies Naturals de Barcelona, 2023.
Rok vydania: 2023
Predmety: 2401.20 Ornitología, 0106 biological sciences, 0301 basic medicine, Resource selection function, Humedales, Biología, neotropical birds, Aves neotropicales, chloroceryle americana, 01 natural sciences, resource selection function, wetlands, 03 medical and health sciences, Función de selección de recursos, Zoología, Neotropical birds, megaceryle torquata, chloroceryle amazona, 15. Life on land, 2401.02 Comportamiento Animal, QL1-991, 2401.06 Ecología Animal, Wetlands, Chloroceryle americana, Megaceryle torquata, 3105.09 Influencia del Hábitat, Chloroceryle amazona, Zoology
Popis: Selecting a suitable perch can offer many benefits for fish–eating birds such as kingfishers. However, factors affecting perch selection in these species remain poorly studied. We studied perch selection in three species of kingfishers inhabiting the Pantanal of Brazil during the dry season: Megaceryle torquata, Chloroceryle amazon, and Chloroceryle americana. First,we determined the habitat use of the three species. We then assessed the perches these kingfishers used based on four ecologically relevant traits: (1) artificial or natural, (2) perch height, (3) distance to the water, and (4) plant cover. We hypothesized that artificial perches could be more likely selected as they may offer better visibility to fish. We used a resource selection function (RSF), in a case/control design, solving it by model selection of six conditional logistic regression competing models. The probability of presence was independent of the artificial origin of a perch for the three species. It was also independent of the other studied variables, except for individuals of C. amazona, which selected higher perches. We conclude that artificial perches do not influence perch selection of the studied kingfishers, which may indicate that these artificial structures are not altering their behavioral choices.
Druh dokumentu: Article
Jazyk: English
ISSN: 2014-928X
1578-665X
DOI: 10.32800/abc.2023.46.0099
Prístupová URL adresa: https://hdl.handle.net/10612/25093
https://museucienciesjournals.cat/en/abc/issue/46-1-2023-abc/perch-selection-of-three-species-of-kingfishers-at-the-pantanal-of-brazil-
https://doaj.org/article/5e1a14fb91e64a45bfd032b415c4698b
https://hdl.handle.net/10481/82766
https://hdl.handle.net/10612/25093
Rights: CC BY
Prístupové číslo: edsair.doi.dedup.....784882ed9fad416f7ea608ae4e21ffdd
Databáza: OpenAIRE
Popis
Abstrakt:Selecting a suitable perch can offer many benefits for fish–eating birds such as kingfishers. However, factors affecting perch selection in these species remain poorly studied. We studied perch selection in three species of kingfishers inhabiting the Pantanal of Brazil during the dry season: Megaceryle torquata, Chloroceryle amazon, and Chloroceryle americana. First,we determined the habitat use of the three species. We then assessed the perches these kingfishers used based on four ecologically relevant traits: (1) artificial or natural, (2) perch height, (3) distance to the water, and (4) plant cover. We hypothesized that artificial perches could be more likely selected as they may offer better visibility to fish. We used a resource selection function (RSF), in a case/control design, solving it by model selection of six conditional logistic regression competing models. The probability of presence was independent of the artificial origin of a perch for the three species. It was also independent of the other studied variables, except for individuals of C. amazona, which selected higher perches. We conclude that artificial perches do not influence perch selection of the studied kingfishers, which may indicate that these artificial structures are not altering their behavioral choices.
ISSN:2014928X
1578665X
DOI:10.32800/abc.2023.46.0099