Sealing effectiveness of a novel NHS-POx based patch: experiments in a dynamic ex vivo porcine lung

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Sealing effectiveness of a novel NHS-POx based patch: experiments in a dynamic ex vivo porcine lung
Authors: Hermans, B.P., Li, W.W.L., Roozen, E.A., Dort, D.I.M. van, Evers, Jort, Heijden, E. van der, Heide, S.M. van der, Goor, H. van, Verhagen, A.F.T.M.
Source: J Thorac Dis
Journal of Thoracic Disease, 15, 7, pp. 3580-3592
Publisher Information: AME Publishing Company, 2023.
Publication Year: 2023
Subject Terms: All institutes and research themes of the Radboud University Medical Center, Radboudumc 9: Rare cancers RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Original Article, Radboudumc 0: Other Research RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc 10: Reconstructive and regenerative medicine RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences
Description: Sealants are used to prevent prolonged pulmonary air leakage (PAL) after lung resections (incidence 5.6-30%). However, clinical evidence to support sealant use is insufficient, with an unmet need for a more effective product. We compared a novel gelatin patch impregnated with functionalized polyoxazolines (NHS-POx) (GATT-Patch) to commercially available sealant products.GATT-Patch Single/Double layers were compared to Progel®, Coseal®, Hemopatch® and TachoSil® in an ex vivo porcine lung model (first experiment). Based on these results, a second head-to-head comparison between GATT-Patch Single and Hemopatch® was performed. Air leakage (AL) was assessed in three settings using increasing ventilatory pressures (max =70 cmH2O): (I) baseline, (II) with 25 mm × 25 mm superficial pleural defect, and (III) after sealant application. Lungs floating on saline (37 ℃) were video recorded for visual AL assessment. Pressure and tidal volumes were collected from the ventilator, and bursting pressure (BP), AL and AL-reduction were determined.Per sealant 10 measurements were performed (both experiments). In the first experiment, BP was superior for GATT-Patch Double (60±24 cmH2O) compared to TachoSil® (30±11 cmH2O, P
Document Type: Article
Other literature type
ISSN: 2077-6624
2072-1439
DOI: 10.21037/jtd-22-1821
Access URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37559645
https://repository.ubn.ru.nl//bitstream/handle/2066/296053/296053.pdf
https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/handle/2066/296053
Rights: CC BY NC ND
Accession Number: edsair.doi.dedup.....68a2bcebd0f10e2fb2797f94c52baf58
Database: OpenAIRE
Description
Abstract:Sealants are used to prevent prolonged pulmonary air leakage (PAL) after lung resections (incidence 5.6-30%). However, clinical evidence to support sealant use is insufficient, with an unmet need for a more effective product. We compared a novel gelatin patch impregnated with functionalized polyoxazolines (NHS-POx) (GATT-Patch) to commercially available sealant products.GATT-Patch Single/Double layers were compared to Progel®, Coseal®, Hemopatch® and TachoSil® in an ex vivo porcine lung model (first experiment). Based on these results, a second head-to-head comparison between GATT-Patch Single and Hemopatch® was performed. Air leakage (AL) was assessed in three settings using increasing ventilatory pressures (max =70 cmH2O): (I) baseline, (II) with 25 mm × 25 mm superficial pleural defect, and (III) after sealant application. Lungs floating on saline (37 ℃) were video recorded for visual AL assessment. Pressure and tidal volumes were collected from the ventilator, and bursting pressure (BP), AL and AL-reduction were determined.Per sealant 10 measurements were performed (both experiments). In the first experiment, BP was superior for GATT-Patch Double (60±24 cmH2O) compared to TachoSil® (30±11 cmH2O, P
ISSN:20776624
20721439
DOI:10.21037/jtd-22-1821