Daptomycin Plus Fosfomycin Versus Daptomycin Alone for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: Daptomycin Plus Fosfomycin Versus Daptomycin Alone for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Autoři: Miquel Pujol, José-María Miró, Evelyn Shaw, Jose-María Aguado, Rafael San-Juan, Mireia Puig-Asensio, Carles Pigrau, Esther Calbo, Miguel Montejo, Regino Rodriguez-Álvarez, María-Jose Garcia-Pais, Vicente Pintado, Rosa Escudero-Sánchez, Joaquín Lopez-Contreras, Laura Morata, Milagros Montero, Marta Andrés, Juan Pasquau, María-del-Mar Arenas, Belén Padilla, Javier Murillas, Alfredo Jover-Sáenz, Luis-Eduardo López-Cortes, Graciano García-Pardo, Oriol Gasch, Sebastian Videla, Pilar Hereu, Cristian Tebé, Natalia Pallarès, Mireia Sanllorente, María-Ángeles Domínguez, Jordi Càmara, Anna Ferrer, Ariadna Padullés, Guillermo Cuervo, Jordi Carratalà, Alex Soriano, Manel Almela, Frederic Gómez, Fernando Chávez, Beatriz Mirelis, Emma Padilla, Maria Dolores Pérez-Ramírez, Mateu Espasa, Ana Maria Sánchez-Díaz, Emilia Cercenado, Enrique Ruiz de Gopegui, Ana Siverio, Marina de Cueto, Fernando García-Garrote, Mercè Garcia, Mariona Xercavins, Maria Nieves Larrosa
Přispěvatelé: MRSA Bacteremia (BACSARM) Trial Investigators, Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (España), Red Española de Investigación en Patología Infecciosa, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (España), European Commission, Spanish Clinical Research Network, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72], Institut Català de la Salut, [Pujol M, Shaw E] Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Institut Investigacions Biomèdiques de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. [Miró JM] Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clinic, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques Agust Pi i Sunyer, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. [Aguado JM, San-Juan R] Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario 12 Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain. [Puig-Asensio M, Pigrau C] Servei de Malalties Infeccioses, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
Zdroj: Clin Infect Dis
Repisalud
Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII)
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau
Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)
RISalud-ANDALUCIA. Repositorio Institucional de Salud de Andalucía
instname
Articles publicats en revistes (Patologia i Terapèutica Experimental)
Dipòsit Digital de la UB
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
Docusalut
Conselleria de Salut i Consum del Govern de les Illes Balears
Repositorio Abierto de la UdL
Universitad de Lleida
r-I3PT. Repositorio Institucional Producción Científica del Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí
Universidad Europea (UEM)
Scientia
Scientia. Dipòsit d'Informació Digital del Departament de Salut
Repositori Obert UdL
Repositorio Institucional de la Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid
Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid
Universidad de Barcelona
Informace o vydavateli: Oxford University Press (OUP), 2020.
Rok vydání: 2020
Témata: Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::/farmacoterapia, daptomycin, Terapéutica, Bacteremia, MRSA, Communicable diseases, Infeccions per estafilococs - Tractament, Bacteris, Bacterièmia, Clinical trials, 0302 clinical medicine, Antibiotics, Medicaments antibacterians - Ús terapèutic, fosfomycin, ANALYTICAL, DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC TECHNIQUES, AND EQUIPMENT::Therapeutics::Combined Modality Therapy, Other subheadings::Other subheadings::Other subheadings::/drug therapy, Endocarditis, Adulto, Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina, Bacterèmia, Fosfomicina, ENFERMEDADES::infecciones bacterianas y micosis::infecciones bacterianas::infecciones por bacterias grampositivas::infecciones estafilocócicas, clinical trial, Staphylococcal Infections, Humanos, Anti-Bacterial Agents, 3. Good health, Clinical trial, Treatment Outcome, Antibacterianos, Estafilococ aureus resistent a la meticil·lina, Hospitales, TÉCNICAS Y EQUIPOS ANALÍTICOS, DIAGNÓSTICOS Y TERAPÉUTICOS::terapéutica::tratamiento combinado, Adult, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Infecciones Estafilocócicas, Resultado del Tratamiento, Antibiòtics, Estafilococo aureus resistente a la meticilina, 03 medical and health sciences, Daptomycin, Fosfomycin, Ensayo clínico, Humans, bacteremia, Bacteria, Malalties infeccioses, DISEASES::Bacterial Infections and Mycoses::Bacterial Infections::Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections::Staphylococcal Infections, Staphylococcus aureus resistente a Meticilina, Major Articles and Commentaries, CHEMICALS AND DRUGS::Chemical Actions and Uses::Pharmacologic Actions::Therapeutic Uses::Anti-Infective Agents::Anti-Bacterial Agents, Daptomicina, Bacteriemia, Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus, COMPUESTOS QUÍMICOS Y DROGAS::acciones y usos químicos::acciones farmacológicas::usos terapéuticos::antiinfecciosos::antibacterianos, Assaigs clínics
Popis: Background We aimed to determine whether daptomycin plus fosfomycin provides higher treatment success than daptomycin alone for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia and endocarditis. Methods A randomized (1:1) phase 3 superiority, open-label, and parallel group clinical trial of adult inpatients with MRSA bacteremia was conducted at 18 Spanish hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 10 mg/kg of daptomycin intravenously daily plus 2 g of fosfomycin intravenously every 6 hours, or 10 mg/kg of daptomycin intravenously daily. Primary endpoint was treatment success 6 weeks after the end of therapy. Results Of 167 patients randomized, 155 completed the trial and were assessed for the primary endpoint. Treatment success at 6 weeks after the end of therapy was achieved in 40 of 74 patients who received daptomycin plus fosfomycin and in 34 of 81 patients who were given daptomycin alone (54.1% vs 42.0%; relative risk, 1.29 [95% confidence interval, .93–1.8]; P = .135). At 6 weeks, daptomycin plus fosfomycin was associated with lower microbiologic failure (0 vs 9 patients; P = .003) and lower complicated bacteremia (16.2% vs 32.1%; P = .022). Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 13 of 74 patients (17.6%) receiving daptomycin plus fosfomycin, and in 4 of 81 patients (4.9%) receiving daptomycin alone (P = .018). Conclusions Daptomycin plus fosfomycin provided 12% higher rate of treatment success than daptomycin alone, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. This antibiotic combination prevented microbiological failure and complicated bacteremia, but it was more often associated with adverse events. Clinical Trials Registration NCT01898338.
Druh dokumentu: Article
Other literature type
Popis souboru: application/pdf; application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Jazyk: English
ISSN: 1537-6591
1058-4838
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1081
DOI: 10.13039/501100000780
DOI: 10.13039/501100010198
DOI: 10.13039/501100004587
Přístupová URL adresa: https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa1081/33881479/ciaa1081.pdf
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32725216
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/23328
http://hdl.handle.net/2445/183825
https://iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=5744
https://hdl.handle.net/10668/26334
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/183825
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/265131
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/19522
https://i3pt.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/2333
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85099091169&doi=10.1093/cid/ciaa1081&partnerID=40&md5=6c7f8d079bee069fc5e00f37c9f71183
https://iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=5744
https://hdl.handle.net/11351/7632
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12530/58607
http://hdl.handle.net/2445/183825
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32725216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8096235
https://repositori.upf.edu/handle/10230/47874
http://repositori.uic.es/handle/20.500.12328/2666
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32725216
https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/72/9/1517/5877897
https://ddd.uab.cat/record/283282
Rights: CC BY NC ND
URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
Přístupové číslo: edsair.doi.dedup.....66401b9c2a5f062323c54d908e2533ad
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Popis
Abstrakt:Background We aimed to determine whether daptomycin plus fosfomycin provides higher treatment success than daptomycin alone for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia and endocarditis. Methods A randomized (1:1) phase 3 superiority, open-label, and parallel group clinical trial of adult inpatients with MRSA bacteremia was conducted at 18 Spanish hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 10 mg/kg of daptomycin intravenously daily plus 2 g of fosfomycin intravenously every 6 hours, or 10 mg/kg of daptomycin intravenously daily. Primary endpoint was treatment success 6 weeks after the end of therapy. Results Of 167 patients randomized, 155 completed the trial and were assessed for the primary endpoint. Treatment success at 6 weeks after the end of therapy was achieved in 40 of 74 patients who received daptomycin plus fosfomycin and in 34 of 81 patients who were given daptomycin alone (54.1% vs 42.0%; relative risk, 1.29 [95% confidence interval, .93–1.8]; P = .135). At 6 weeks, daptomycin plus fosfomycin was associated with lower microbiologic failure (0 vs 9 patients; P = .003) and lower complicated bacteremia (16.2% vs 32.1%; P = .022). Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 13 of 74 patients (17.6%) receiving daptomycin plus fosfomycin, and in 4 of 81 patients (4.9%) receiving daptomycin alone (P = .018). Conclusions Daptomycin plus fosfomycin provided 12% higher rate of treatment success than daptomycin alone, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. This antibiotic combination prevented microbiological failure and complicated bacteremia, but it was more often associated with adverse events. Clinical Trials Registration NCT01898338.
ISSN:15376591
10584838
DOI:10.1093/cid/ciaa1081