Diversity and directionality: friends or foes in sustainability transitions?: friends or foes in sustainability transitions?

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Názov: Diversity and directionality: friends or foes in sustainability transitions?: friends or foes in sustainability transitions?
Autori: Bulah, Brit M., van Mierlo, Barbara, Beumer, Koen, Gerritsen, Alwin L., Negro, Simona O., Hekkert, Marko P., Klerkx, Laurens
Zdroj: Science and Public Policy. 51:1075-1092
Informácie o vydavateľovi: Oxford University Press (OUP), 2024.
Rok vydania: 2024
Predmety: directionality, mission-oriented innovation, transformative innovation policy, 0502 economics and business, 05 social sciences, plant-based protein, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, Life Science, protein transition, 02 engineering and technology, diversity
Popis: Literature on mission-specific innovation systems (MIS) highlights the crucial role of directionality when achieving sustainability transitions, while diversity literature emphasizes the need to keep diverse directions open. Like directionality, diversity is created by innovation system actors to tackle the complex and uncertain nature of transitions. While these two literature strands are presented largely independent of one another, both are deemed necessary to achieve sociotechnical transitions. We thus aim to uncover how diversity and directionality unfold in parallel in a MIS. We conduct a qualitative single-case study of the Wageningen alternative protein ecosystem to provide insights into the types of sociotechnological trajectories actors pursue and how different selection environments shape the development of each solution. We observe a mission exhibiting a clear direction toward (meat) substitutes. Underlying this mission, diversity is visible. We propose that the interplay between diversity and directionality in a MIS can be best understood by distinguishing two different sociotechnical “levels” in which they play out: the levels of transition paths (“first-order” directionality) and search directions (“second-order” directionality). We therefore call for a more nuanced understanding of the role of diversity and directionality in transitions.
Druh dokumentu: Article
Jazyk: English
ISSN: 1471-5430
0302-3427
DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scae044
Prístupová URL adresa: https://research-portal.uu.nl/en/publications/06760795-852e-4267-b926-343ca874e983
https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scae044
Rights: CC BY
Prístupové číslo: edsair.doi.dedup.....5b8cbcb0189c1bbe9b6b531b7ae80e41
Databáza: OpenAIRE
Popis
Abstrakt:Literature on mission-specific innovation systems (MIS) highlights the crucial role of directionality when achieving sustainability transitions, while diversity literature emphasizes the need to keep diverse directions open. Like directionality, diversity is created by innovation system actors to tackle the complex and uncertain nature of transitions. While these two literature strands are presented largely independent of one another, both are deemed necessary to achieve sociotechnical transitions. We thus aim to uncover how diversity and directionality unfold in parallel in a MIS. We conduct a qualitative single-case study of the Wageningen alternative protein ecosystem to provide insights into the types of sociotechnological trajectories actors pursue and how different selection environments shape the development of each solution. We observe a mission exhibiting a clear direction toward (meat) substitutes. Underlying this mission, diversity is visible. We propose that the interplay between diversity and directionality in a MIS can be best understood by distinguishing two different sociotechnical “levels” in which they play out: the levels of transition paths (“first-order” directionality) and search directions (“second-order” directionality). We therefore call for a more nuanced understanding of the role of diversity and directionality in transitions.
ISSN:14715430
03023427
DOI:10.1093/scipol/scae044