In EDS ansehen

GPS tracking methods for spatiotemporal air pollution exposure assessment: comparison and challenges in study implementation: comparison and challenges in study implementation

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Titel: GPS tracking methods for spatiotemporal air pollution exposure assessment: comparison and challenges in study implementation: comparison and challenges in study implementation
Autoren: Kyriakou, Kalliopi, Flückiger, Benjamin, Vienneau, Danielle, Probst-Hensch, Nicole, Jeong, Ayoung, Imboden, Medea, Karsies, Aletta, Schmitz, Oliver, Karssenberg, Derek, Vermeulen, Roel, Hoek, Gerard, de Hoogh, Kees
Quelle: Int J Health Geogr
Verlagsinformationen: Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2025.
Publikationsjahr: 2025
Schlagwörter: Adult, Male, Research, Netherlands/epidemiology, Middle Aged, Mobile Applications, Air Pollution/analysis, Cohort Studies, Switzerland/epidemiology, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Geographic Information Systems/standards, Environmental Monitoring/methods, Aged, Environmental Exposure/analysis
Beschreibung: Background Epidemiological studies investigating long-term health effects of air pollution typically only consider the residential locations of the participants, thereby ignoring the space-time activity patterns that likely influence total exposure. This paper, part of a study in which residential-only and mobility-integrated exposures were compared in two tracking campaigns, reflects on GPS device choice, privacy, and recruitment strategy. Methods Tracking campaigns were conducted in Switzerland and the Netherlands. Participants completed a baseline questionnaire, carried a GPS device (SODAQ) for 2 weeks, and used a smartphone app for a time activity diary. The app also tracked GPS, albeit less frequently. Tracks were combined with air pollution surfaces to quantify NO2 and PM2.5 exposure by activity. Results In Switzerland, participants were recruited from the COVCO-Basel cohort (33% recruitment rate; 489 of 1,475). In the Netherlands, -random recruitment was unsuccessful (1.4% rate; 41 of 3,000). Targeted recruitment with leaflets and a financial incentive (25 Euro voucher) increased participation to 189. Comparisons between smartphone app and SODAQ device data showed moderate to high correlations (R2 > 0.57) for total NO2 exposure and NO2 exposure at home in both study areas. Activity-specific correlations ranged from 0.43 to 0.63. PM2.5 correlations in Switzerland were moderate to high, but lower in the Netherlands (R2 = 0.28–0.58), due to smaller spatial contrast in observed PM2.5 levels (RMSE 3). Conclusions Tracking can be effectively conducted using a mobile app or GPS device. The app’s low-frequency GPS readings (every 3–4 min) were sufficient for long-term air pollution exposure assessment. For finer-scale readings, a dedicated GPS device is recommended. Tracking campaigns are crucial for studying personal exposure to air pollution but face challenges due to low recruitment rates and strict privacy regulations. Leveraging an existing cohort can improve recruitment, while targeted leaflet distribution with financial incentives can enhance participation in studies without a pre-recruited group.
Publikationsart: Article
Other literature type
Sprache: English
ISSN: 1476-072X
DOI: 10.1186/s12942-025-00405-x
Zugangs-URL: https://research-portal.uu.nl/en/publications/ab728b4d-213e-4013-ad06-9663ee56dcee
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-025-00405-x
Rights: CC BY
Dokumentencode: edsair.doi.dedup.....54381f7f900a36df5485e3900b4dce2a
Datenbank: OpenAIRE
Beschreibung
Abstract:Background Epidemiological studies investigating long-term health effects of air pollution typically only consider the residential locations of the participants, thereby ignoring the space-time activity patterns that likely influence total exposure. This paper, part of a study in which residential-only and mobility-integrated exposures were compared in two tracking campaigns, reflects on GPS device choice, privacy, and recruitment strategy. Methods Tracking campaigns were conducted in Switzerland and the Netherlands. Participants completed a baseline questionnaire, carried a GPS device (SODAQ) for 2 weeks, and used a smartphone app for a time activity diary. The app also tracked GPS, albeit less frequently. Tracks were combined with air pollution surfaces to quantify NO2 and PM2.5 exposure by activity. Results In Switzerland, participants were recruited from the COVCO-Basel cohort (33% recruitment rate; 489 of 1,475). In the Netherlands, -random recruitment was unsuccessful (1.4% rate; 41 of 3,000). Targeted recruitment with leaflets and a financial incentive (25 Euro voucher) increased participation to 189. Comparisons between smartphone app and SODAQ device data showed moderate to high correlations (R2 > 0.57) for total NO2 exposure and NO2 exposure at home in both study areas. Activity-specific correlations ranged from 0.43 to 0.63. PM2.5 correlations in Switzerland were moderate to high, but lower in the Netherlands (R2 = 0.28–0.58), due to smaller spatial contrast in observed PM2.5 levels (RMSE 3). Conclusions Tracking can be effectively conducted using a mobile app or GPS device. The app’s low-frequency GPS readings (every 3–4 min) were sufficient for long-term air pollution exposure assessment. For finer-scale readings, a dedicated GPS device is recommended. Tracking campaigns are crucial for studying personal exposure to air pollution but face challenges due to low recruitment rates and strict privacy regulations. Leveraging an existing cohort can improve recruitment, while targeted leaflet distribution with financial incentives can enhance participation in studies without a pre-recruited group.
ISSN:1476072X
DOI:10.1186/s12942-025-00405-x