Enacting a Grand Challenge for Business and Society: Media Discourse and Institutional Responses to COVID-19 in Three National Contexts: News Media Discourse and Institutional Response to COVID-19 in Three National Contexts
Uložené v:
| Názov: | Enacting a Grand Challenge for Business and Society: Media Discourse and Institutional Responses to COVID-19 in Three National Contexts: News Media Discourse and Institutional Response to COVID-19 in Three National Contexts |
|---|---|
| Autori: | Bennet Schwoon, Dennis Schoeneborn, Andreas Georg Scherer |
| Zdroj: | SSRN Electronic Journal. |
| Informácie o vydavateľovi: | Elsevier BV, 2021. |
| Rok vydania: | 2021 |
| Predmety: | 05 social sciences, 1. No poverty, COVID-19, Grand challenges, 16. Peace & justice, Crisis, 12. Responsible consumption, 3. Good health, Media discourse, 5. Gender equality, 13. Climate action, 11. Sustainability, 8. Economic growth, 0502 economics and business, Pandemics, Social problem work |
| Popis: | The COVID-19 pandemic challenges businesses and societies around the world. Despite the pandemic’s character as a ‘brute fact’, even in countries with similar political and media systems the identification of a public crisis and the development of political responses differ widely. To understand differences in speediness, mixture, and escalation of institutional responses to COVID-19 in this study we aim to examine the ‘social problem work’ around the pandemic, i.e. how and why social problems become identified as such via processes of social construction, particularly in news media. In recent years management studies have increasingly focused on grand challenges (GC) conceiving of GC largely as given phenomena. However, this booming literature tends to neglectthe communicatively constructed character of social phenomena and has yet to explore how and why certain phenomena are conceived as social problems. To understand differences in institutional responses, we explore social constructions around COVID-19 by investigating public discourse through an analysis of articles from leading traditional newspapers from the UK, Germany and Switzerland focusing on the time frame between the first official mentioning of SARS-CoV-2 on Dec. 31, 2019 until first respective lock-down decisions in March, 2020. In our empirical study, we identified “Perceived degree of affectedness”, “Individualism vs. collectivism”, “Coping with uncertainty”, and “Discourse quality” as mechanisms of ‘social problem work’ which help tounderstand and explain differences in speediness, mixture, and escalation of institutional responses across the three countries. Our study extends current literature on GC by addressing how GC arise and find recognition as such inthe first place. These mechanisms might help to explain initial difficulties to cope with other GC and help to explain difficulties regarding issues that are currently largely in a latent or emerging stage such as demographic change, genetic modification of non-human entities or the role of artificial intelligence in our lives. |
| Druh dokumentu: | Article Conference object Other literature type |
| Jazyk: | English |
| ISSN: | 1556-5068 |
| DOI: | 10.2139/ssrn.3894942 |
| Prístupová URL adresa: | https://hdl.handle.net/10398/d9d619ad-6da1-4283-9875-48300a36534b https://research.cbs.dk/en/publications/d9d619ad-6da1-4283-9875-48300a36534b https://privpapers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3894942 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID3894942_code4722400.pdf?abstractid=3894942&mirid=1 |
| Prístupové číslo: | edsair.doi.dedup.....53385ab807b423f8d4986405fdd8a70f |
| Databáza: | OpenAIRE |
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science | Abstrakt: | The COVID-19 pandemic challenges businesses and societies around the world. Despite the pandemic’s character as a ‘brute fact’, even in countries with similar political and media systems the identification of a public crisis and the development of political responses differ widely. To understand differences in speediness, mixture, and escalation of institutional responses to COVID-19 in this study we aim to examine the ‘social problem work’ around the pandemic, i.e. how and why social problems become identified as such via processes of social construction, particularly in news media. In recent years management studies have increasingly focused on grand challenges (GC) conceiving of GC largely as given phenomena. However, this booming literature tends to neglectthe communicatively constructed character of social phenomena and has yet to explore how and why certain phenomena are conceived as social problems. To understand differences in institutional responses, we explore social constructions around COVID-19 by investigating public discourse through an analysis of articles from leading traditional newspapers from the UK, Germany and Switzerland focusing on the time frame between the first official mentioning of SARS-CoV-2 on Dec. 31, 2019 until first respective lock-down decisions in March, 2020. In our empirical study, we identified “Perceived degree of affectedness”, “Individualism vs. collectivism”, “Coping with uncertainty”, and “Discourse quality” as mechanisms of ‘social problem work’ which help tounderstand and explain differences in speediness, mixture, and escalation of institutional responses across the three countries. Our study extends current literature on GC by addressing how GC arise and find recognition as such inthe first place. These mechanisms might help to explain initial difficulties to cope with other GC and help to explain difficulties regarding issues that are currently largely in a latent or emerging stage such as demographic change, genetic modification of non-human entities or the role of artificial intelligence in our lives. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 15565068 |
| DOI: | 10.2139/ssrn.3894942 |