How the Green Architecture of the 2023–2027 Common Agricultural Policy could have been greener
Uloženo v:
| Název: | How the Green Architecture of the 2023–2027 Common Agricultural Policy could have been greener |
|---|---|
| Autoři: | Guyomard, Herve, Détang-Dessendre, Cécile, Dupraz, Pierre, Delaby, Luc, Huyghe, Christian, Peyraud, Jean-Louis, Reboud, Xavier, Sirami, Clélia |
| Přispěvatelé: | Bernard, Emilie, Services déconcentrés d'appui à la recherche Bretagne-Normandie (SDAR Bretagne Normandie), Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Centre d'économie et de sociologie rurales appliquées à l'agriculture et aux espaces ruraux (CESAER), Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté COMUE (UBFC)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Institut Agro Dijon, Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro), Structures et Marché Agricoles, Ressources et Territoires (SMART), Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Institut Agro Rennes Angers, Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Elevage Rennes (PEGASE), Collège de Direction (CODIR), Agroécologie Dijon, Université de Bourgogne (UB)-Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté COMUE (UBFC)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Institut Agro Dijon, Dynamiques et écologie des paysages agriforestiers (DYNAFOR), École nationale supérieure agronomique de Toulouse (ENSAT), Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Ecole d'Ingénieurs de Purpan (INP - PURPAN), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE) |
| Zdroj: | Ambio |
| Informace o vydavateli: | Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2023. |
| Rok vydání: | 2023 |
| Témata: | 2. Zero hunger, Conservation of Natural Resources, Farmers, [SDV.SA.AEP] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Agriculture, economy and politics, Agri-environment and climate measures (AECM), Agriculture, 15. Life on land, Environment, European agriculture, 7. Clean energy, Eco-schemes, Policy, 13. Climate action, 11. Sustainability, Perspective, Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), Humans, Conditionality, [SDV.SA.AEP]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Agriculture, economy and politics |
| Popis: | A new 5-year Common Agricultural Policy has been in place since January 2023. Like its predecessors, this new policy will fail to deliver significant climatic and environmental benefits. We show how the Green Architecture of the policy relying on the three instruments of conditionality, eco-schemes, and agri-environment and climate measures could have been used more consistently and effectively. Our proposals are based on core principles of public economics and fiscal federalism as well as on research results in agronomy and ecology. Conditionality criteria are the minimal requirements that every agricultural producer must meet. Farmers should be rewarded for efforts that go beyond these basic requirements through eco-schemes for global public goods complemented by agri-environment and climate measures centred on local public goods. Eco-schemes should cover the whole agricultural area by targeting permanent grasslands, crop diversification, and green cover and non-productive agro-ecological infrastructures. We discuss trade-offs that our proposals could generate. |
| Druh dokumentu: | Article Conference object Other literature type |
| Popis souboru: | application/pdf |
| Jazyk: | English |
| ISSN: | 1654-7209 0044-7447 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s13280-023-01861-0 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s13280-023-01861-0#abs1 |
| Přístupová URL adresa: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37148420 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-04099653v1/document https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-023-01861-0 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-04099653v1 |
| Rights: | CC BY URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
| Přístupové číslo: | edsair.doi.dedup.....4c2fbdd11f9a7fad33527a7e72e001d2 |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Abstrakt: | A new 5-year Common Agricultural Policy has been in place since January 2023. Like its predecessors, this new policy will fail to deliver significant climatic and environmental benefits. We show how the Green Architecture of the policy relying on the three instruments of conditionality, eco-schemes, and agri-environment and climate measures could have been used more consistently and effectively. Our proposals are based on core principles of public economics and fiscal federalism as well as on research results in agronomy and ecology. Conditionality criteria are the minimal requirements that every agricultural producer must meet. Farmers should be rewarded for efforts that go beyond these basic requirements through eco-schemes for global public goods complemented by agri-environment and climate measures centred on local public goods. Eco-schemes should cover the whole agricultural area by targeting permanent grasslands, crop diversification, and green cover and non-productive agro-ecological infrastructures. We discuss trade-offs that our proposals could generate. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 16547209 00447447 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s13280-023-01861-0 |
Full Text Finder
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science