Cost-effectiveness of Chagas disease screening in Latin American migrants at primary health-care centres in Europe: a Markov model analysis

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Titel: Cost-effectiveness of Chagas disease screening in Latin American migrants at primary health-care centres in Europe: a Markov model analysis
Autoren: María-Jesús Pinazo, Sheila Bussion, Andrea Angheben, Yves-Laurent Julien Jackson, Joaquim Gascon, Ana Requena-Méndez, Elisa Sicuri, Jose Muñoz, David Moore, Edelweiss Aldasoro
Quelle: Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
instname
Articles publicats en revistes (ISGlobal)
Dipòsit Digital de la UB
Universidad de Barcelona
The Lancet Global Health, Vol 5, Iss 4, Pp e439-e447 (2017)
E447
E439
The Lancet Global Health, Vol. 5, No 4 (2017) pp. e439-e447
Verlagsinformationen: Elsevier BV, 2017.
Publikationsjahr: 2017
Schlagwörter: Male, 0301 basic medicine, BENZNIDAZOLE, HEPATITIS-B, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Antiprotozoal Agents/economics, Antiprotozoal Agents, UNITED-STATES, Emigrants and Immigrants, Emigrants and Immigrants/statistics & numerical data, ECONOMIC-EVALUATION, Environmental & Occupational Health, Mass Screening/economics/statistics & numerical data, Europe/epidemiology, CLINICAL PROFILE, Chagas Disease/diagnosis/economics/ethnology, 03 medical and health sciences, NONENDEMIC COUNTRY, 0302 clinical medicine, Malaltia de Chagas, ETIOLOGIC TREATMENT, Humans, Mass Screening, TRYPANOSOMA-CRUZI INFECTION, Chagas Disease, ddc:613, Public, Environmental & Occupational Health, Science & Technology, Primary Health Care, SPAIN, 1. No poverty, Public, RANDOMIZED-TRIAL, Latin Americans, WA Public Health, Latin America/ethnology, 3. Good health, Chagas' disease, Europe, Primary Health Care/economics/organization & administration, Latin America, Female, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270, Llatinoamericans, Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Beschreibung: Chagas disease is currently prevalent in European countries hosting large communities from Latin America. Whether asymptomatic individuals at risk of Chagas disease living in Europe should be screened and treated accordingly is unclear. We performed an economic evaluation of systematic Chagas disease screening of the Latin American population attending primary care centres in Europe.We constructed a decision tree model that compared the test option (screening of asymptomatic individuals, treatment, and follow-up of positive cases) with the no-test option (screening, treating, and follow-up of symptomatic individuals). The decision tree included a Markov model with five states, related to the chronic stage of the disease: indeterminate, cardiomyopathy, gastrointestinal, response to treatment, and death. The model started with a target population of 100 000 individuals, of which 4·2% (95% CI 2·2-6·8) were estimated to be infected by Trypanosoma cruzi. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) between test and no-test options. Deterministic and probabilistic analyses (Monte Carlo simulations) were performed.In the deterministic analysis, total costs referred to 100 000 individuals in the test and no-test option were €30 903 406 and €6 597 403 respectively, with a difference of €24 306 003. The respective number of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained in the test and no-test option were 61 820·82 and 57 354·42. The ICER was €5442. In the probabilistic analysis, total costs for the test and no-test option were €32 163 649 (95% CI 31 263 705-33 063 593) and €6 904 764 (6 703 258-7 106 270), respectively. The respective number of QALYs gained was 64 634·35 (95% CI 62 809·6-66 459·1) and 59 875·73 (58 191·18-61 560·28). The difference in QALYs gained between the test and no test options was 4758·62 (95% CI 4618·42-4898·82). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was €6840·75 (95% CI 2545-2759) per QALY gained for a treatment efficacy of 20% and €4243 per QALY gained for treatment efficacy of 50%. Even with a reduction in Chagas disease prevalence to 0·05% and with large variations in all the parameters, the test option would still be more cost-effective than the no-test option (less than €30000 per QALY).Screening for Chagas disease in asymptomatic Latin American adults living in Europe is a cost-effective strategy. Findings of our model provide an important element to support the implementation of T cruzi screening programmes at primary health centres in European countries hosting Latin American migrants.European Commission 7th Framework Program.
Publikationsart: Article
Dateibeschreibung: application/pdf; Ahead of print; text
Sprache: English
ISSN: 2214-109X
DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(17)30073-6
Zugangs-URL: http://www.thelancet.com/article/S2214109X17300736/pdf
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28256340
http://hdl.handle.net/2445/108833
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/108833
https://doaj.org/article/e8b6212e381a4e87abaa19029007db71
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/langlo/article/PIIS2214-109X(17)30073-6/fulltext
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214109X17300736
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214109X17300736
http://middleeast.thelancet.com/journals/langlo/article/PIIS2214-109X(17)30073-6/fulltext
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langlo/article/PIIS2214-109X(17)30073-6/fulltext
https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20173203032
http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/47996
https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:102442
Rights: CC BY
CC BY NC ND
Dokumentencode: edsair.doi.dedup.....471b1f45570e4b33662df79d9ab7cbc1
Datenbank: OpenAIRE
Beschreibung
Abstract:Chagas disease is currently prevalent in European countries hosting large communities from Latin America. Whether asymptomatic individuals at risk of Chagas disease living in Europe should be screened and treated accordingly is unclear. We performed an economic evaluation of systematic Chagas disease screening of the Latin American population attending primary care centres in Europe.We constructed a decision tree model that compared the test option (screening of asymptomatic individuals, treatment, and follow-up of positive cases) with the no-test option (screening, treating, and follow-up of symptomatic individuals). The decision tree included a Markov model with five states, related to the chronic stage of the disease: indeterminate, cardiomyopathy, gastrointestinal, response to treatment, and death. The model started with a target population of 100 000 individuals, of which 4·2% (95% CI 2·2-6·8) were estimated to be infected by Trypanosoma cruzi. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) between test and no-test options. Deterministic and probabilistic analyses (Monte Carlo simulations) were performed.In the deterministic analysis, total costs referred to 100 000 individuals in the test and no-test option were €30 903 406 and €6 597 403 respectively, with a difference of €24 306 003. The respective number of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained in the test and no-test option were 61 820·82 and 57 354·42. The ICER was €5442. In the probabilistic analysis, total costs for the test and no-test option were €32 163 649 (95% CI 31 263 705-33 063 593) and €6 904 764 (6 703 258-7 106 270), respectively. The respective number of QALYs gained was 64 634·35 (95% CI 62 809·6-66 459·1) and 59 875·73 (58 191·18-61 560·28). The difference in QALYs gained between the test and no test options was 4758·62 (95% CI 4618·42-4898·82). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was €6840·75 (95% CI 2545-2759) per QALY gained for a treatment efficacy of 20% and €4243 per QALY gained for treatment efficacy of 50%. Even with a reduction in Chagas disease prevalence to 0·05% and with large variations in all the parameters, the test option would still be more cost-effective than the no-test option (less than €30000 per QALY).Screening for Chagas disease in asymptomatic Latin American adults living in Europe is a cost-effective strategy. Findings of our model provide an important element to support the implementation of T cruzi screening programmes at primary health centres in European countries hosting Latin American migrants.European Commission 7th Framework Program.
ISSN:2214109X
DOI:10.1016/s2214-109x(17)30073-6