The intersection of sex and field: an examination of career choice factors and dropout intentions in STEM and non-STEM degrees

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Názov: The intersection of sex and field: an examination of career choice factors and dropout intentions in STEM and non-STEM degrees
Autori: Baltà Salvador, Rosó, Peña Carrera, Marta, Renta Davids, Ana-Inés, Olmedo Torre, Noelia
Prispievatelia: Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament d’Enginyeria Gràfica i de Disseny, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament de Matemàtiques, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. SOC-STEM - Impacte Social de les STEM
Zdroj: UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)
Informácie o vydavateľovi: Informa UK Limited, 2024.
Rok vydania: 2024
Predmety: Abandó dels estudis (Ensenyament universitari), Education, Higher, College dropouts, Under-represented minorities, 4. Education, Dones en l'ensenyament universitari, Career choice, Education, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Ensenyament i aprenentatge::Ensenyament universitari, 5. Gender equality, Higher, Ensenyament universitari, Dropout intentions, STEM degrees, 10. No inequality, Women in higher education, Female students
Popis: The under-representation of women in male-dominated STEM fields is a worldwide concern. However, there are other academic fields, like some non-STEM degrees, where female students are over-represented. Previous research has identified five critical factors influencing student participation rates: career choice, satisfaction, self-esteem, discrimination, and dropout. Based on a sample of 402 students, this study examines the educational experiences of female students in male-dominated STEM degrees compared to those in female-dominated non-STEM degrees. The study also compares results between male students in STEM and non-STEM degrees. The findings reveal that STEM female students are less likely to choose their studies based on vocation, associated with dropout intentions. Moreover, STEM female students have higher dropout intentions and feel less self-esteem. For female STEM students, dropout intentions are related to self-esteem, discrimination, and satisfaction. This study highlights differences between minority groups in STEM and non-STEM degrees and offers valuable information to address the under-representation of female students in technical fields
The authors wish to thank all the students from the UPC and the URV who took part in answering the questionnaire and the teachers who facilitated its distribution
Druh dokumentu: Article
Popis súboru: application/pdf
Jazyk: English
ISSN: 1469-5898
0304-3797
DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2024.2319044
Rights: CC BY NC ND
Prístupové číslo: edsair.doi.dedup.....4362b87982ba38c1b2aa2b61a8ddc9e5
Databáza: OpenAIRE
Popis
Abstrakt:The under-representation of women in male-dominated STEM fields is a worldwide concern. However, there are other academic fields, like some non-STEM degrees, where female students are over-represented. Previous research has identified five critical factors influencing student participation rates: career choice, satisfaction, self-esteem, discrimination, and dropout. Based on a sample of 402 students, this study examines the educational experiences of female students in male-dominated STEM degrees compared to those in female-dominated non-STEM degrees. The study also compares results between male students in STEM and non-STEM degrees. The findings reveal that STEM female students are less likely to choose their studies based on vocation, associated with dropout intentions. Moreover, STEM female students have higher dropout intentions and feel less self-esteem. For female STEM students, dropout intentions are related to self-esteem, discrimination, and satisfaction. This study highlights differences between minority groups in STEM and non-STEM degrees and offers valuable information to address the under-representation of female students in technical fields<br />The authors wish to thank all the students from the UPC and the URV who took part in answering the questionnaire and the teachers who facilitated its distribution
ISSN:14695898
03043797
DOI:10.1080/03043797.2024.2319044