Role grouping experiments: a new method for studying organization re-design decisions

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: Role grouping experiments: a new method for studying organization re-design decisions
Autoři: Nicolay Worren, Federico Cammelli
Přispěvatelé: Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
Zdroj: Journal of Organization Design
Informace o vydavateli: Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2025.
Rok vydání: 2025
Témata: Organization design, Role grouping, Interdependencies, Clustering, Task complexity, 46 Information and Computing Sciences, 4608 Human-Centred Computing
Popis: We developed an experimental method to investigate organization design and grouping decisions more specifically. We demonstrate the method in a study with 285 participants. The participants were asked to group a set of nine roles into units using card-sorting. The role descriptions indicated that there were interdependencies between some of the roles. Participants’ grouping decisions were quantified and compared against an algorithmic solution that minimized coordination costs. It was found that a relatively small difference in task complexity between groups greatly affected participants’ performance. We discuss how the method can be extended to study a range of variables related to decision-making about organization design.
Druh dokumentu: Article
Popis souboru: application/pdf; text/xml; application/application/pdf
Jazyk: English
ISSN: 2245-408X
DOI: 10.1007/s41469-025-00189-1
DOI: 10.3929/ethz-b-000736060
Přístupová URL adresa: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/388698
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41469-025-00189-1
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/736060
Rights: CC BY
Přístupové číslo: edsair.doi.dedup.....3f5cf93301456282567f6a5625e6f6aa
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Popis
Abstrakt:We developed an experimental method to investigate organization design and grouping decisions more specifically. We demonstrate the method in a study with 285 participants. The participants were asked to group a set of nine roles into units using card-sorting. The role descriptions indicated that there were interdependencies between some of the roles. Participants’ grouping decisions were quantified and compared against an algorithmic solution that minimized coordination costs. It was found that a relatively small difference in task complexity between groups greatly affected participants’ performance. We discuss how the method can be extended to study a range of variables related to decision-making about organization design.
ISSN:2245408X
DOI:10.1007/s41469-025-00189-1