View in EDS

Barriers and facilitators to implementing workplace interventions to promote mental health: qualitative evidence synthesis

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Barriers and facilitators to implementing workplace interventions to promote mental health: qualitative evidence synthesis
Authors: Paterson, Charlotte, Leduc, Caleb, Maxwell, Margaret, Aust, Birgit, Strachan, Heather, O’Connor, Ainslie, Tsantila, Fotini, Cresswell-Smith, Johanna, Purebl, Gyorgy, Winter, Lars, Fanaj, Naim, Doukani, Asmae, Hogg, Bridget, Corcoran, Paul, D’Alessandro, Luigia, Mathieu, Sharna, Hegerl, Ulrich, Arensman, Ella, Greiner, Birgit A., The MENTUPP Consortium, Meksi, Andia, Szekely, Andras, Como, Ariel, Dushaj, Arilda, Cerga, Arlinda, Justicia, Azucena, Amann, Benedikt, Van Audenhove, Chantal, Lockwood, Chris, O’Connor, Cliodhna, Dhalaigh, Doireann Ni, Kim, Dooyoung, Williamson, Eileen, Zsak, Eva, Griffin, Eve, Coppens, Evelien, Burazeri, Genc, Qirjako, Gentiana, Davey, Grace, de Paredes, Hanna Reich, Van Weeghel, Jaap, Alcaraz, Juan Carlos Medina, Hug, Juliane, Abula, Kahar, Kõlves, Kairi, Mulcahy, Karen, Thomson, Katherine, Wahlbeck, Kristian, Cox, Laura, Leduc, Mallorie, McNally, Marta Fontana, Hauck, Pia, Rugulies, Reiner, Benson, Ruth, Rapeli, Saara, Sanches, Sarita, Mustafa, Sevim, Hackel, Stefan, King, Tanya, Scott, Vanda, Solà, Víctor Pérez, Ross, Victoria, Orchard, Wendy
Source: Syst Rev
Systematic Reviews, Vol 13, Iss 1, Pp 1-24 (2024)
Systematic reviews
England
Systematic Reviews, 13(1):152
Publisher Information: Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2024.
Publication Year: 2024
Subject Terms: Scoping review, STRESS, PARTICIPATION, Health Promotion, 03 medical and health sciences, wellbeing, Medicine, General & Internal, Organisation interventions, 0302 clinical medicine, General & Internal Medicine, SEARCH, 0502 economics and business, PROGRAM, Humans, Workplace, 11 Medical and Health Sciences, Qualitative Research, Occupational Health, WORK, Science & Technology, 42 Health sciences, Wellbeing, Barriers and facilitators, Research, 05 social sciences, 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences, CARE, FRAMEWORK, MENTUPP Consortium, 3. Good health, Leadership [MeSH], Occupational Health [MeSH], Humans [MeSH], Mental Health [MeSH], Systematic review, Mental health, Qualitative Research [MeSH], Workplace/psychology [MeSH], Health Promotion/methods [MeSH], Implementation science, Leadership, Mental Health, BURNOUT, Medicine, EMPLOYEES, WORKPLACE, NURSES, Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Description: Background Despite growing interest in workplace mental health interventions, evidence of their effectiveness is mixed. Implementation science offers a valuable lens to investigate the factors influencing successful implementation. However, evidence synthesis is lacking, especially for small-to-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and for specific work sectors. The objectives of this review are to establish the scope of research with explicit analysis of implementation aspects of workplace mental health interventions and to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation in general and within SMEs and selected sectors. Methods A systematic scoping review and meta-synthesis of mixed methods process evaluation research from 11 databases, with the evaluation of methodological quality (MMAT) and confidence in findings (CERQual), was conducted. We selected information-rich studies and synthesised them using domains within the Nielsen and Randall implementation framework: context, intervention activities, implementation; and mental models. Results We included 43 studies published between 2009 and 2022, of which 22 were rated as information-rich to be analysed for barriers and facilitators. Most studies were conducted in healthcare. Facilitators reflecting ‘high confidence’ included: relevant and tailored content, continuous and pro-active leadership buy-in and support, internal or external change agents/champions, assistance from managers and peers, resources, and senior-level experience and awareness of mental health issues. Healthcare sector-specific facilitators included: easy accessibility with time provided, fostering relationships, clear communication, and perceptions of the intervention. Stigma and confidentiality issues were reported as barriers overall. Due to the small number of studies within SMEs reported findings did not reach ‘high confidence’. A lack of studies in construction and Information and Communication Technology meant separate analyses were not possible. Conclusions There is dependable evidence of key factors for the implementation of workplace mental health interventions which should be used to improve implementation. However, there is a lack of studies in SMEs and in a larger variety of sectors. Systematic review registration Research Registry (reviewregistry897).
Document Type: Article
Other literature type
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02569-2
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3658425/v1
Access URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38849924
https://doaj.org/article/f5dd3225969741fc94639068fbb6206a
https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/20.500.12942/744161
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02569-2
http://hdl.handle.net/10147/645975
https://repository.publisso.de/resource/frl:6508072
Rights: CC BY
URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Accession Number: edsair.doi.dedup.....3eccacaf0614482f3dcce7b0b540bd7b
Database: OpenAIRE
Description
Abstract:Background Despite growing interest in workplace mental health interventions, evidence of their effectiveness is mixed. Implementation science offers a valuable lens to investigate the factors influencing successful implementation. However, evidence synthesis is lacking, especially for small-to-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and for specific work sectors. The objectives of this review are to establish the scope of research with explicit analysis of implementation aspects of workplace mental health interventions and to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation in general and within SMEs and selected sectors. Methods A systematic scoping review and meta-synthesis of mixed methods process evaluation research from 11 databases, with the evaluation of methodological quality (MMAT) and confidence in findings (CERQual), was conducted. We selected information-rich studies and synthesised them using domains within the Nielsen and Randall implementation framework: context, intervention activities, implementation; and mental models. Results We included 43 studies published between 2009 and 2022, of which 22 were rated as information-rich to be analysed for barriers and facilitators. Most studies were conducted in healthcare. Facilitators reflecting ‘high confidence’ included: relevant and tailored content, continuous and pro-active leadership buy-in and support, internal or external change agents/champions, assistance from managers and peers, resources, and senior-level experience and awareness of mental health issues. Healthcare sector-specific facilitators included: easy accessibility with time provided, fostering relationships, clear communication, and perceptions of the intervention. Stigma and confidentiality issues were reported as barriers overall. Due to the small number of studies within SMEs reported findings did not reach ‘high confidence’. A lack of studies in construction and Information and Communication Technology meant separate analyses were not possible. Conclusions There is dependable evidence of key factors for the implementation of workplace mental health interventions which should be used to improve implementation. However, there is a lack of studies in SMEs and in a larger variety of sectors. Systematic review registration Research Registry (reviewregistry897).
ISSN:20464053
DOI:10.1186/s13643-024-02569-2