Current perspectives on the role of ridge (socket) preservation procedures in dental implant treatment in the aesthetic zone

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: Current perspectives on the role of ridge (socket) preservation procedures in dental implant treatment in the aesthetic zone
Autoři: Ivanovski, S, Kassim, B, Mattheos, N
Zdroj: Australian Dental Journal. 59:48-56
Informace o vydavateli: Wiley, 2013.
Rok vydání: 2013
Témata: bone graft, Organ Sparing Treatments - methods, Ridge preservation, Clinical sciences, Dentistry not elsewhere classified, bone augmentation, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use, Alveolar Process, Humans, Periodontal - methods, Tooth Socket, Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal - methods, Dental Implants, Minerals, dental implant, Guided Tissue Regeneration, ridge augmentation, Alveolar Ridge Augmentation, 3. Good health, Clinical sciences not elsewhere classified, 3500 Dentistry, Dentistry, Bone Substitutes, Tooth Extraction, Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal, Alveolar Process - surgery, Organ Sparing Treatments
Popis: Augmentation of the extraction socket (ridge preservation) is increasingly being advocated in anticipation of implant placement. The aim of this article is to review the available evidence with regards to ridge preservation procedures, investigating whether these techniques improve dental implant treatment outcomes. Evidence is examined to compare these techniques to other treatment alternatives such as implant placement with simultaneous lateral augmentation. An electronic PubMed search was conducted using search terms relevant to assessing treatment outcomes in association with ridge preservation. Titles were screened and full text obtained where relevant. Further full text articles were obtained from analysis of those papers yielded from the original search. Twenty‐two papers were finally selected for analysis. Ridge preservation techniques are effective in minimizing post‐extraction alveolar ridge contraction. However, there is insufficient evidence to suggest that the use of these techniques in conjunction with dental implant treatment improves implant treatment outcomes. Furthermore, ridge preservation does not necessarily eliminate the need for further simultaneous augmentation at the time of implant placement. The delayed healing associated with ridge preservation using socket grafting necessitates a commitment to a delayed placement protocol. The extended treatment time, compromised healing and expense related to ridge preservation suggests a more cautious approach with regards to the indication of such techniques.
Druh dokumentu: Article
Jazyk: English
ISSN: 1834-7819
0045-0421
DOI: 10.1111/adj.12098
Přístupová URL adresa: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/adj.12098
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24588310
https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/handle/10072/57388
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24588310
https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:696496
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/adj.12098
https://hub.hku.hk/handle/10722/200408
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/adj.12098
http://hdl.handle.net/10722/200408
Rights: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Přístupové číslo: edsair.doi.dedup.....314c07987dfadf7492898e6d1847ae7b
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Popis
Abstrakt:Augmentation of the extraction socket (ridge preservation) is increasingly being advocated in anticipation of implant placement. The aim of this article is to review the available evidence with regards to ridge preservation procedures, investigating whether these techniques improve dental implant treatment outcomes. Evidence is examined to compare these techniques to other treatment alternatives such as implant placement with simultaneous lateral augmentation. An electronic PubMed search was conducted using search terms relevant to assessing treatment outcomes in association with ridge preservation. Titles were screened and full text obtained where relevant. Further full text articles were obtained from analysis of those papers yielded from the original search. Twenty‐two papers were finally selected for analysis. Ridge preservation techniques are effective in minimizing post‐extraction alveolar ridge contraction. However, there is insufficient evidence to suggest that the use of these techniques in conjunction with dental implant treatment improves implant treatment outcomes. Furthermore, ridge preservation does not necessarily eliminate the need for further simultaneous augmentation at the time of implant placement. The delayed healing associated with ridge preservation using socket grafting necessitates a commitment to a delayed placement protocol. The extended treatment time, compromised healing and expense related to ridge preservation suggests a more cautious approach with regards to the indication of such techniques.
ISSN:18347819
00450421
DOI:10.1111/adj.12098