Comparative Analysis of Psychology Responding to COVID-19 Pandemic in Brics Nations
Gespeichert in:
| Titel: | Comparative Analysis of Psychology Responding to COVID-19 Pandemic in Brics Nations |
|---|---|
| Autoren: | Katie Moraes de Almondes, Lisiane Bizarro, Maria Cristina de Oliveira Santos Miyazaki, María Rita Zoéga Soares, Ana Carolina Peuker, Maycoln Leôni Martins Teodoro, João Gabriel Modesto, Аleksander Veraksa, Purnima Singh, Bo Han, Tholene Sodi |
| Quelle: | Front Psychol Frontiers in Psychology, Vol 12 (2021) |
| Verlagsinformationen: | Frontiers Media SA, 2021. |
| Publikationsjahr: | 2021 |
| Schlagwörter: | Public relations, Social Psychology, Economics, FOS: Political science, actions, Population, Social Sciences, Health Professions, International psychology, Infectious disease (medical specialty), psychology, Applied psychology, 03 medical and health sciences, Context (archaeology), 0302 clinical medicine, Health Sciences, Pathology, Psychology, Disease, Empowerment and Collaboration in Community Health, Pandemics, Political science, Economic growth, Development economics, Critical psychology, Pandemic, Geography, COVID-19, Impact of Stigma on Mental Health Care, BF1-990, 3. Good health, telepsychology, health workers, FOS: Psychology, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), Clinical Psychology, Environmental health, Archaeology, General Health Professions, BRICS forum, Impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health, Asian psychology, Medicine |
| Beschreibung: | The BRICS Forum, an independent international organization encouraging commercial, political, and cultural cooperation between Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, was formed in 2011, and these countries have a significant influence on their regional affairs. These nations were hit by COVID-19 at different times, and all adopted home quarantine to reduce the spread of the virus. We present a comparative analysis of actions of psychology and potential outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in BRICS nations regarding five aspects: psychology in health policies, social roles of psychology, socioeconomic context, actions for the general population, and health professionals during stage 1 of the pandemic, and possible actions in stage 2. Various types of actions were taken by psychologists in BRICS, with different levels of coordinated cooperation with respective governmental and non-governmental organizations, multiple and parallel efforts from different scientific societies, and professional regulatory agencies. Scientific societies have had an important role in coordinating some of these efforts, especially because they congregate the psychologists from different parts of these countries, improving communication and access to key information. The aim of these actions varies from improving situational skills and competences to increase the accessibility of psychological services and provide psychoeducation and telepsychology. We will consider the social importance of these actions within these countries as a global opportunity for psychology to stage in a complex context involving human health. The way psychology in BRICS will face this challenging situation is likely to produce important regional influence, stimulate scientific contribution, and increase the accessibility of psychology. |
| Publikationsart: | Article Other literature type |
| ISSN: | 1664-1078 |
| DOI: | 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.567585 |
| DOI: | 10.60692/6mrge-w2796 |
| DOI: | 10.60692/7ptzp-ykh59 |
| Zugangs-URL: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.567585/pdf https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34149490 https://doaj.org/article/69220d0989d249a5b6c97f64a18fbaf9 https://europepmc.org/article/MED/34149490 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.567585/full https://search.bvsalud.org/global-literature-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/resource/en/covidwho-1278436 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.567585 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8210845 https://doaj.org/article/69220d0989d249a5b6c97f64a18fbaf9 |
| Rights: | CC BY |
| Dokumentencode: | edsair.doi.dedup.....30c0c462a6dc085cb54d613e34f606ed |
| Datenbank: | OpenAIRE |
| Abstract: | The BRICS Forum, an independent international organization encouraging commercial, political, and cultural cooperation between Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, was formed in 2011, and these countries have a significant influence on their regional affairs. These nations were hit by COVID-19 at different times, and all adopted home quarantine to reduce the spread of the virus. We present a comparative analysis of actions of psychology and potential outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in BRICS nations regarding five aspects: psychology in health policies, social roles of psychology, socioeconomic context, actions for the general population, and health professionals during stage 1 of the pandemic, and possible actions in stage 2. Various types of actions were taken by psychologists in BRICS, with different levels of coordinated cooperation with respective governmental and non-governmental organizations, multiple and parallel efforts from different scientific societies, and professional regulatory agencies. Scientific societies have had an important role in coordinating some of these efforts, especially because they congregate the psychologists from different parts of these countries, improving communication and access to key information. The aim of these actions varies from improving situational skills and competences to increase the accessibility of psychological services and provide psychoeducation and telepsychology. We will consider the social importance of these actions within these countries as a global opportunity for psychology to stage in a complex context involving human health. The way psychology in BRICS will face this challenging situation is likely to produce important regional influence, stimulate scientific contribution, and increase the accessibility of psychology. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 16641078 |
| DOI: | 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.567585 |
Full Text Finder
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science