Anterior approach to the cervical spine: Elegance lies in its simplicity
Gespeichert in:
| Titel: | Anterior approach to the cervical spine: Elegance lies in its simplicity |
|---|---|
| Autoren: | Arumalla, Kirit, Bansal, Hanish, Jadeja, Jigarsingh, Batish, Aman, Deora, Harsh, Tripathi, Manjul, Mohindra, Sandeep, Behari, Sanjay |
| Quelle: | Asian J Neurosurg |
| Verlagsinformationen: | Georg Thieme Verlag KG, 2021. |
| Publikationsjahr: | 2021 |
| Schlagwörter: | 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Systematic Review Article, 3. Good health |
| Beschreibung: | Introduction: Since the landmark publication by Smith and Robinson, approaches to the cervical spine anteriorly have undergone many modifications and even additions. Nevertheless, at its core, the anterior approach remains an elegant and efficient approach to deal with majority of cervical spine pathologies including the degenerative cervical spine. Methodology: For this review, we searched for all major cases series and randomized control trials of anterior cervical approaches using the PubMed databases. Articles having the details of clinical variables and outcomes were tabulated and analyzed. Results: A total of 9 case series for transoral, 7 case series for transmanubrial, 19 case series for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), 6 studies for ACDF versus posterior cervical foraminotomy, 37 case series for ACDF versus arthroplasty, and 7 studies for ACDF versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion have been included. The majority of the case series suggested that the anterior cervical procedures have good clinical outcomes. The upper cervical spine approached by the transoral route had good outcomes in ventral compressive pathologies, with morbidity of cerebrospinal fluid leak in 7% of patients. The midcervical spine approached by ACDF had better clinical outcomes equivalent to the majority of modifications even in multiple-level pathologies. The transsternal approach had provided greater access and stability to the cervicothoracic junction with minimal morbidity. Conclusion: The anterior cervical approach can address the majority of cervical pathologies. They provide adequate corridor from craniovertebral junction to T4 with minimal morbidity, thus providing a good clinical outcome. |
| Publikationsart: | Article Other literature type |
| Sprache: | English |
| ISSN: | 2248-9614 1793-5482 |
| DOI: | 10.4103/ajns.ajns_313_20 |
| Zugangs-URL: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751502 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35071061 |
| Rights: | CC BY NC ND URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
| Dokumentencode: | edsair.doi.dedup.....2e650e68147d28e16e37f4daf0cc59bc |
| Datenbank: | OpenAIRE |
Full Text 
Full Text Finder 
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science | Abstract: | Introduction: Since the landmark publication by Smith and Robinson, approaches to the cervical spine anteriorly have undergone many modifications and even additions. Nevertheless, at its core, the anterior approach remains an elegant and efficient approach to deal with majority of cervical spine pathologies including the degenerative cervical spine. Methodology: For this review, we searched for all major cases series and randomized control trials of anterior cervical approaches using the PubMed databases. Articles having the details of clinical variables and outcomes were tabulated and analyzed. Results: A total of 9 case series for transoral, 7 case series for transmanubrial, 19 case series for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), 6 studies for ACDF versus posterior cervical foraminotomy, 37 case series for ACDF versus arthroplasty, and 7 studies for ACDF versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion have been included. The majority of the case series suggested that the anterior cervical procedures have good clinical outcomes. The upper cervical spine approached by the transoral route had good outcomes in ventral compressive pathologies, with morbidity of cerebrospinal fluid leak in 7% of patients. The midcervical spine approached by ACDF had better clinical outcomes equivalent to the majority of modifications even in multiple-level pathologies. The transsternal approach had provided greater access and stability to the cervicothoracic junction with minimal morbidity. Conclusion: The anterior cervical approach can address the majority of cervical pathologies. They provide adequate corridor from craniovertebral junction to T4 with minimal morbidity, thus providing a good clinical outcome. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 22489614 17935482 |
| DOI: | 10.4103/ajns.ajns_313_20 |