Reliability of interview-based ADL ability measures in older adults obtained by occupational therapists, physical therapists, and nursing staff
Uložené v:
| Názov: | Reliability of interview-based ADL ability measures in older adults obtained by occupational therapists, physical therapists, and nursing staff |
|---|---|
| Autori: | Eva Ejlersen Wæhrens, Kristina Tomra Nielsen |
| Zdroj: | Disability and Rehabilitation. 46:5380-5386 |
| Informácie o vydavateľovi: | Informa UK Limited, 2024. |
| Rok vydania: | 2024 |
| Predmety: | Male, Aged, 80 and over, evaluation, Activities of daily living, interview, Reproducibility of Results, self-report, Middle Aged, Physical Therapists, Interviews as Topic, outcome measures, Disability Evaluation, Occupational Therapists, Occupational Therapy, Geriatric Assessment/methods, Activities of Daily Living, 80 and over, Humans, Female, Nursing Staff, Geriatric Assessment, Aged |
| Popis: | To examine the reliability of ADL interview (ADL-I) ability measures when administered by different health professionals (HPs).Older adults with stable ADL ability were invited to participate in three ADL-I interviews, administered by occupational therapists (OTs), physical therapists (PTs), and nursing staff (NS), respectively. Methods based on classic and modern test theory were applied.Overall, n = 36 older adults and n = 11 HPs participated. Intraclass Correlation Coefficients were acceptable for research purposes (> 0.7), but not for clinical use. Mean differences in ADL ability measures were significant when comparing measures based on interviews by OTs to measures based on interviews by PTs and NS. Further, in 25 to 47% of the individuals, ADL-I ability measures differed significantly across HPs. Limits of Agreement revealed that measures based on interviews by OTs were systematically lower compared to measures based on interviews by PTs and NS. Four ADL-I items displayed Differential Item Functioning based on HP.When using the ADL-I, it is recommended to only involve one profession, to increase the reliability of measures. Results highlight the importance of evaluating reliability of measures based on instruments administered across HPs before implementation in rehabilitation practice and research. |
| Druh dokumentu: | Article |
| Jazyk: | English |
| ISSN: | 1464-5165 0963-8288 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/09638288.2023.2301476 |
| Prístupová URL adresa: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38206177 https://portal.findresearcher.sdu.dk/da/publications/25a9d607-b7e5-4875-ae33-a13970988d09 https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2023.2301476 |
| Prístupové číslo: | edsair.doi.dedup.....15731e97bd1a48ee433cf28376d456a8 |
| Databáza: | OpenAIRE |
| Abstrakt: | To examine the reliability of ADL interview (ADL-I) ability measures when administered by different health professionals (HPs).Older adults with stable ADL ability were invited to participate in three ADL-I interviews, administered by occupational therapists (OTs), physical therapists (PTs), and nursing staff (NS), respectively. Methods based on classic and modern test theory were applied.Overall, n = 36 older adults and n = 11 HPs participated. Intraclass Correlation Coefficients were acceptable for research purposes (> 0.7), but not for clinical use. Mean differences in ADL ability measures were significant when comparing measures based on interviews by OTs to measures based on interviews by PTs and NS. Further, in 25 to 47% of the individuals, ADL-I ability measures differed significantly across HPs. Limits of Agreement revealed that measures based on interviews by OTs were systematically lower compared to measures based on interviews by PTs and NS. Four ADL-I items displayed Differential Item Functioning based on HP.When using the ADL-I, it is recommended to only involve one profession, to increase the reliability of measures. Results highlight the importance of evaluating reliability of measures based on instruments administered across HPs before implementation in rehabilitation practice and research. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 14645165 09638288 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/09638288.2023.2301476 |
Full Text Finder
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science