Comparison of ground-based Brewer and FTIR total column O3 monitoring techniques

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: Comparison of ground-based Brewer and FTIR total column O3 monitoring techniques
Autoři: Schneider, Matthias, Redondas, Alberto, Hase, Frank, Guirado-Fuentes, Carmen, Blumenstock, Thomas, Cuevas Agulló, Emilio
Zdroj: ARCIMIS. Archivo Climatológico y Meteorológico Institucional (AEMET)
Agencia Estatal de Meteorología (AEMET)
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol 8, Iss 18, Pp 5535-5550 (2008)
Informace o vydavateli: Copernicus GmbH, 2008.
Rok vydání: 2008
Témata: Column ozone, Espectrómetros Brewer, Espectrofotómetros Brewer, Physics, QC1-999, 4. Education, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, Ozone measurement, 01 natural sciences, Brewer spectrophotometer, Chemistry, FTIR, 13. Climate action, Measurement techniques, 11. Sustainability, Técnicas de medida, Columna de ozono, Brewer spectrometer, FTIR spectrometer, Ozono, QD1-999, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences
Popis: We compare the currently most precise, ground-based total O3 measurement techniques: Brewer and FTIR. We give an overview of the similarities and the differences between the measurements and the retrieval approaches of both experiments. We compare coincident measurements performed at the Atmospheric Observatory of Izaña from 2005 to 2007 and demonstrate that, if the properties of the instruments are well characterised, the scatter between both experiments is as small as 0.5%. This is in agreement with the theoretical predictions and confirms empirically that both techniques are able to monitor total O3 amounts with a precision of better than 0.4%. However, we found systematic differences between both techniques of around 4.5%, which we think are mainly due to discrepancies between the applied UV and infrared spectroscopic parameters.
Druh dokumentu: Article
Other literature type
Popis souboru: application/pdf
Jazyk: English
ISSN: 1680-7324
DOI: 10.5194/acp-8-5535-2008
Přístupová URL adresa: https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/8/5535/2008/acp-8-5535-2008.pdf
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11765/6383
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11765/1295
https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/8/5535/2008/
https://doaj.org/article/73a99ae9d114440fa7c5b067f0b50b78
http://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ACP.....8.5535S/abstract
https://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/110071007
https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/EGU-ACPD/hal-00303239v1
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00303239/document
https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/8/5535/2008/acp-8-5535-2008.pdf
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00303239
Rights: CC BY
Přístupové číslo: edsair.doi.dedup.....0c4008310d25b7be383afce566d8f95c
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Popis
Abstrakt:We compare the currently most precise, ground-based total O3 measurement techniques: Brewer and FTIR. We give an overview of the similarities and the differences between the measurements and the retrieval approaches of both experiments. We compare coincident measurements performed at the Atmospheric Observatory of Izaña from 2005 to 2007 and demonstrate that, if the properties of the instruments are well characterised, the scatter between both experiments is as small as 0.5%. This is in agreement with the theoretical predictions and confirms empirically that both techniques are able to monitor total O3 amounts with a precision of better than 0.4%. However, we found systematic differences between both techniques of around 4.5%, which we think are mainly due to discrepancies between the applied UV and infrared spectroscopic parameters.
ISSN:16807324
DOI:10.5194/acp-8-5535-2008