Barriers to urban hydrometeorological simulation: a review
Uloženo v:
| Název: | Barriers to urban hydrometeorological simulation: a review |
|---|---|
| Autoři: | Xuan Chen, Job Augustijn van der Werf, Arjan Droste, Miriam Coenders-Gerrits, Remko Uijlenhoet |
| Zdroj: | Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol 29, Pp 3447-3480 (2025) |
| Informace o vydavateli: | Copernicus GmbH, 2025. |
| Rok vydání: | 2025 |
| Témata: | Environmental sciences, Technology, Geography. Anthropology. Recreation, GE1-350, Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering, TD1-1066 |
| Popis: | Urban areas, characterized by dense populations and many socioeconomic activities, increasingly suffer from floods, droughts and heat stress due to land use and climate change. Traditionally, the urban thermal environment and water resource management have been studied separately, using urban land-surface models (ULSMs) and urban hydrological models (UHMs). However, as our understanding deepens and the urgency to address future climate disasters grows, it becomes clear that hydroclimatological extremes – such as floods, droughts, severe urban thermal environments and more frequent heat waves – are actually not always isolated events but can be compound events. This underscores the close interaction between the water cycle and the energy balance. Consequently, the existing separation between ULSMs and UHMs creates significant obstacles in better understanding urban hydrological and meteorological processes, which is crucial for addressing the high risks posed by climate change. Defining the future direction of process-based models for hydrometeorological predictions and assessments is essential for better managing extreme events and evaluating response measures in densely populated urban areas. Our review focuses on three critical aspects of urban hydrometeorological simulation: similarities, differences and gaps among different models; existing gaps in physical process implementations; and efforts, challenges and potential for model coupling and integration. We find that ULSMs inadequately represent water surfaces and hydraulic systems, while UHMs lack explicit surface energy balance solutions and detailed building representations. Coupled models show the potential for simulating urban hydrometeorological environments but face challenges at regional and neighbourhood scales. Our review highlights the need for interdisciplinary communication between the urban climatology and the urban water management communities to enhance urban hydrometeorological simulation models. |
| Druh dokumentu: | Article Other literature type |
| Popis souboru: | application/pdf |
| Jazyk: | English |
| ISSN: | 1607-7938 |
| DOI: | 10.5194/hess-29-3447-2025 |
| Přístupová URL adresa: | https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/29/3447/2025/ https://doaj.org/article/6d2f61a4d6fd41f180426a2410895fde |
| Rights: | CC BY |
| Přístupové číslo: | edsair.doi.dedup.....08283483679e358f5ec67233e1411b6e |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Full Text Finder 
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science | Abstrakt: | Urban areas, characterized by dense populations and many socioeconomic activities, increasingly suffer from floods, droughts and heat stress due to land use and climate change. Traditionally, the urban thermal environment and water resource management have been studied separately, using urban land-surface models (ULSMs) and urban hydrological models (UHMs). However, as our understanding deepens and the urgency to address future climate disasters grows, it becomes clear that hydroclimatological extremes – such as floods, droughts, severe urban thermal environments and more frequent heat waves – are actually not always isolated events but can be compound events. This underscores the close interaction between the water cycle and the energy balance. Consequently, the existing separation between ULSMs and UHMs creates significant obstacles in better understanding urban hydrological and meteorological processes, which is crucial for addressing the high risks posed by climate change. Defining the future direction of process-based models for hydrometeorological predictions and assessments is essential for better managing extreme events and evaluating response measures in densely populated urban areas. Our review focuses on three critical aspects of urban hydrometeorological simulation: similarities, differences and gaps among different models; existing gaps in physical process implementations; and efforts, challenges and potential for model coupling and integration. We find that ULSMs inadequately represent water surfaces and hydraulic systems, while UHMs lack explicit surface energy balance solutions and detailed building representations. Coupled models show the potential for simulating urban hydrometeorological environments but face challenges at regional and neighbourhood scales. Our review highlights the need for interdisciplinary communication between the urban climatology and the urban water management communities to enhance urban hydrometeorological simulation models. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 16077938 |
| DOI: | 10.5194/hess-29-3447-2025 |