Specificity in clustering of gene-specific transcription factors is encoded in the genome

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Specificity in clustering of gene-specific transcription factors is encoded in the genome
Authors: Shivali Dongre, Nadine L Vastenhouw
Source: Nucleic Acids Res
Nucleic acids research, vol. 53, no. 13
Publisher Information: Oxford University Press (OUP), 2025.
Publication Year: 2025
Subject Terms: Gene regulation, Chromatin and Epigenetics, Animals, Zebrafish/genetics, Zebrafish/embryology, Zebrafish/metabolism, Transcription Factors/genetics, Transcription Factors/metabolism, Transcription Factors/chemistry, Zebrafish Proteins/genetics, Zebrafish Proteins/metabolism, Zebrafish Proteins/chemistry, Genome, Multigene Family, Octamer Transcription Factor-3/genetics, Octamer Transcription Factor-3/metabolism, Octamer Transcription Factor-3/chemistry, Nanog Homeobox Protein/genetics, Nanog Homeobox Protein/metabolism, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins/metabolism, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins/genetics, DNA/metabolism, Embryo, Nonmammalian/metabolism
Description: Gene-specific transcription factors (TFs) often form clusters in the nucleus. Such clusters can facilitate transcription, but it remains unclear how they form. It has been suggested that clusters are seeded by the sequence-specific binding of TFs to DNA and grow by interactions between intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) that bring in more TFs. In this model, specificity in TF clustering must be provided by the IDRs. To investigate this model, we studied TF clustering by quantitative imaging of Nanog, Pou5f3, and Sox19b in zebrafish embryos. Using mutant TFs, we show that the formation of a TF cluster requires the DNA-binding domain (DBD) as well as at least one of its IDRs. Importantly, IDRs are not sufficient to join a pre-existing cluster. Rather, both IDR and DBD are needed. Finally, using chimeric TFs, we show that while IDRs are required to join a cluster, they are quite promiscuous, and it is the DBD that provides specificity to the clustering of a TF. Thus, for any TF to join a cluster, motif recognition is required, which explains the specificity in TF cluster formation. Taken together, our work provides an alternative model for how specificity is achieved in the organization of transcriptional machinery in the nucleus.
Document Type: Article
Other literature type
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
ISSN: 1362-4962
0305-1048
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaf625
Access URL: https://serval.unil.ch/notice/serval:BIB_4CD68E481E64
http://nbn-resolving.org/urn/resolver.pl?urn=urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_4CD68E481E641
https://serval.unil.ch/resource/serval:BIB_4CD68E481E64.P001/REF.pdf
Rights: CC BY
URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Accession Number: edsair.doi.dedup.....05668d9dcd0c1cb9ac928aa122d65cf9
Database: OpenAIRE
Description
Abstract:Gene-specific transcription factors (TFs) often form clusters in the nucleus. Such clusters can facilitate transcription, but it remains unclear how they form. It has been suggested that clusters are seeded by the sequence-specific binding of TFs to DNA and grow by interactions between intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) that bring in more TFs. In this model, specificity in TF clustering must be provided by the IDRs. To investigate this model, we studied TF clustering by quantitative imaging of Nanog, Pou5f3, and Sox19b in zebrafish embryos. Using mutant TFs, we show that the formation of a TF cluster requires the DNA-binding domain (DBD) as well as at least one of its IDRs. Importantly, IDRs are not sufficient to join a pre-existing cluster. Rather, both IDR and DBD are needed. Finally, using chimeric TFs, we show that while IDRs are required to join a cluster, they are quite promiscuous, and it is the DBD that provides specificity to the clustering of a TF. Thus, for any TF to join a cluster, motif recognition is required, which explains the specificity in TF cluster formation. Taken together, our work provides an alternative model for how specificity is achieved in the organization of transcriptional machinery in the nucleus.
ISSN:13624962
03051048
DOI:10.1093/nar/gkaf625