Perception and knowledge of early pregnancy assessment units among perinatal practitioners in Europe

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: Perception and knowledge of early pregnancy assessment units among perinatal practitioners in Europe
Autoři: Blavier, Frederic, Cosyns, Stefan, Dony, Noelie, Faron, Gilles, Parra, Jose, Gucciardo, Leonardo
Přispěvatelé: Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Centre for Reproductive Medicine - Gynaecology, Surgical clinical sciences, Mother and Child, Public Health Sciences
Zdroj: International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 143:289-299
Informace o vydavateli: Wiley, 2018.
Rok vydání: 2018
Témata: Adult, Male, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Maternal Health Services/organization & administration, perception, Midwifery, Chorionic Gonadotropin, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, 03 medical and health sciences, Fetus, 0302 clinical medicine, Fetus/diagnostic imaging, Pregnancy, Humans, Maternal Health Services, Prospective Studies, Pregnancy Trimester, First/blood, Prenatal Care, Middle Aged, 16. Peace & justice, radiology, 3. Good health, Europe, Obstetrics, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Gestational Sac, Gestational Sac/diagnostic imaging, Gynecology, Health Care Surveys, Chorionic Gonadotropin/blood, Female, Perception, pregnancy, prenatal care
Popis: ObjectiveTo investigate perceptions of early pregnancy assessment units (EPAUs) among perinatal practitioners working in Belgium, France, and Switzerland.MethodsA prospective multinational survey was conducted between September 1, 2015, and May 21, 2016. Obstetricians, gynecologists, medical doctors, radiologists, and midwives were recruited during meetings, via e‐mail invitations, or through the websites of regional obstetrics and gynecology scientific societies. The survey comprised 17 questions that assessed the participants’ knowledge, interest, and management of early pregnancy.ResultsOf the 871 individuals invited to participate in the survey, 306 (35.1%) responded. Most of the participants were gynecologists and/or obstetricians (225 [73.5%]). A total of 258 (84.3%) participants had no or limited knowledge about EPAUs. Furthermore, 211 (69.0%) participants reported incorrect management when they visualized a gestational sac without embryo and 265 (86.6%) misinterpreted changes in serum levels of chorionic gonadotropin during early pregnancy. In all, 201 (65.7%) participants were interested in collaboration with an EPAU; however, only 125 (40.8%) had sufficient time and resources available to support a patient's psychological distress after early pregnancy loss or salpingectomy.ConclusionKnowledge about early management of pregnancy was limited among the perinatal practitioners surveyed; however, the concept of EPAUs was welcomed by many.
Druh dokumentu: Article
Jazyk: English
ISSN: 1879-3479
0020-7292
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12661
Přístupová URL adresa: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30182449
https://researchportal.vub.be/en/publications/perception-and-knowledge-of-early-pregnancy-assessment-units-amon
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30182449
https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijgo.12661
Rights: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Přístupové číslo: edsair.doi.dedup.....042d653ecf0095f615e0e4ee5e4e2724
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Popis
Abstrakt:ObjectiveTo investigate perceptions of early pregnancy assessment units (EPAUs) among perinatal practitioners working in Belgium, France, and Switzerland.MethodsA prospective multinational survey was conducted between September 1, 2015, and May 21, 2016. Obstetricians, gynecologists, medical doctors, radiologists, and midwives were recruited during meetings, via e‐mail invitations, or through the websites of regional obstetrics and gynecology scientific societies. The survey comprised 17 questions that assessed the participants’ knowledge, interest, and management of early pregnancy.ResultsOf the 871 individuals invited to participate in the survey, 306 (35.1%) responded. Most of the participants were gynecologists and/or obstetricians (225 [73.5%]). A total of 258 (84.3%) participants had no or limited knowledge about EPAUs. Furthermore, 211 (69.0%) participants reported incorrect management when they visualized a gestational sac without embryo and 265 (86.6%) misinterpreted changes in serum levels of chorionic gonadotropin during early pregnancy. In all, 201 (65.7%) participants were interested in collaboration with an EPAU; however, only 125 (40.8%) had sufficient time and resources available to support a patient's psychological distress after early pregnancy loss or salpingectomy.ConclusionKnowledge about early management of pregnancy was limited among the perinatal practitioners surveyed; however, the concept of EPAUs was welcomed by many.
ISSN:18793479
00207292
DOI:10.1002/ijgo.12661