Does collaborative remembering serve a directive function? Examining the influence of collaborative remembering on subsequent decision making

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Názov: Does collaborative remembering serve a directive function? Examining the influence of collaborative remembering on subsequent decision making
Autori: Abel, Magdalena
Zdroj: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 78:1932-1948
Informácie o vydavateľovi: SAGE Publications, 2025.
Rok vydania: 2025
Predmety: 150 Psychologie, Social contagion, collaboration, false memory, decision making, ddc:150
Popis: Remembering together with others can facilitate memory for previously encountered contents, but can also prompt social contagion with information not previously encountered. This study examined whether these effects of collaborative remembering might serve a directive function and guide subsequent individual decisions. Participants were tested in groups of three and completed an adapted version of a prisoner’s dilemma. They initially encountered faces of different players on a screen, who cooperated with them or acted as cheaters. Some of these players were encountered by all three participants, others by single participants only. An interpolated memory test on all players was completed individually or collaboratively. During a final decision game, participants were asked to decide whether to cooperate with each player or not. Three experiments were conducted, which additionally varied encoding, the retention interval before the interpolated memory test, and format and instructions for the interpolated memory test. The results consistently showed adaptive decision making. Participants were more likely to cooperate with players who had previously cooperated with them, relative to both new players and cheaters. Interpolated collaborative remembering had no benefit, however—neither for decisions toward directly encountered players nor for decisions toward players encountered by other participants. Effects of collaborative remembering may thus not serve a directive function and guide future behavior, or at least they may not do so in this adapted version of a prisoner’s dilemma.
Druh dokumentu: Article
Popis súboru: application/pdf
Jazyk: English
ISSN: 1747-0226
1747-0218
DOI: 10.1177/17470218251325246
DOI: 10.5283/epub.77057
DOI: 10.5283/epub.7705710.1177/17470218251325246
Prístupová URL adresa: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40012532
https://epub.uni-regensburg.de/77057/
Rights: CC BY
Prístupové číslo: edsair.doi.dedup.....02d5f8b36bb5c13bc92c5ade0182a6cd
Databáza: OpenAIRE
Popis
Abstrakt:Remembering together with others can facilitate memory for previously encountered contents, but can also prompt social contagion with information not previously encountered. This study examined whether these effects of collaborative remembering might serve a directive function and guide subsequent individual decisions. Participants were tested in groups of three and completed an adapted version of a prisoner’s dilemma. They initially encountered faces of different players on a screen, who cooperated with them or acted as cheaters. Some of these players were encountered by all three participants, others by single participants only. An interpolated memory test on all players was completed individually or collaboratively. During a final decision game, participants were asked to decide whether to cooperate with each player or not. Three experiments were conducted, which additionally varied encoding, the retention interval before the interpolated memory test, and format and instructions for the interpolated memory test. The results consistently showed adaptive decision making. Participants were more likely to cooperate with players who had previously cooperated with them, relative to both new players and cheaters. Interpolated collaborative remembering had no benefit, however—neither for decisions toward directly encountered players nor for decisions toward players encountered by other participants. Effects of collaborative remembering may thus not serve a directive function and guide future behavior, or at least they may not do so in this adapted version of a prisoner’s dilemma.
ISSN:17470226
17470218
DOI:10.1177/17470218251325246