The rise of the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency in hydrology
Saved in:
| Title: | The rise of the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency in hydrology |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Melsen, Lieke A., Puy, Arnald, Torfs, Paul J.J.F., Saltelli, Andrea |
| Source: | Hydrological Sciences Journal. 70:1248-1259 |
| Publisher Information: | Informa UK Limited, 2025. |
| Publication Year: | 2025 |
| Subject Terms: | enculturation, performance metric, hydrological modelling, sociology of modelling |
| Description: | The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) is commonly used as a model evaluation metric in hydrology, but its prominence is often taken for granted. This study explores the social factors behind its adoption. Introduced in 1970, the NSE gained traction as computational advancements spurred the growth of hydrological models and evaluation metrics. This, in turn, led to the need to converge on broadly accepted metrics. In 1990, a committee recommended the NSE alongside two other metrics. One of the main developers of SWAT, a widely used hydrological model, adopted only the NSE part of this recommendation, solidifying the NSE’s dominance. This storyline shows that the NSE’s primacy appears to be derived more from tradition than from any demonstration of technical superiority. To date, path dependence is visible in on-going research efforts resulting from the popularity of the NSE. This historical perspective highlights how social processes have shaped the way hydrological models are evaluated. |
| Document Type: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| ISSN: | 2150-3435 0262-6667 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/02626667.2025.2475105 |
| Access URL: | https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/the-rise-of-the-nash-sutcliffe-efficiency-in-hydrology https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2025.2475105 |
| Rights: | CC BY |
| Accession Number: | edsair.doi.dedup.....0254e4114aa117f106049276094f88c2 |
| Database: | OpenAIRE |
Full Text Finder 
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science | Abstract: | The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) is commonly used as a model evaluation metric in hydrology, but its prominence is often taken for granted. This study explores the social factors behind its adoption. Introduced in 1970, the NSE gained traction as computational advancements spurred the growth of hydrological models and evaluation metrics. This, in turn, led to the need to converge on broadly accepted metrics. In 1990, a committee recommended the NSE alongside two other metrics. One of the main developers of SWAT, a widely used hydrological model, adopted only the NSE part of this recommendation, solidifying the NSE’s dominance. This storyline shows that the NSE’s primacy appears to be derived more from tradition than from any demonstration of technical superiority. To date, path dependence is visible in on-going research efforts resulting from the popularity of the NSE. This historical perspective highlights how social processes have shaped the way hydrological models are evaluated. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 21503435 02626667 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/02626667.2025.2475105 |