Involving the Salafi-Jihadist in Indonesia's democratic system.

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Názov: Involving the Salafi-Jihadist in Indonesia's democratic system.
Autori: RIDUAN, Imam Malik, POSSAMAI, Adam
Zdroj: Social Compass; Sep2025, Vol. 72 Issue 3, p443-460, 18p
Predmety: MUSLIMS, SALAFIYAH, COUNTERTERRORISM, INDONESIANS, INTERNAL security, DEMOCRACY, PERSONAL security, SOCIAL policy
Geografický termín: INDONESIA
Abstract (English): This research examines the securitisation of Muslims within the context of Indonesia's democratic system, focusing on the perceptions and experiences of Salafi groups. Applying a critical ethnographic methodology, the study amplifies the voices of a particular group of Muslim in Indonesia, particularly those who have distanced themselves from extremist actions, to understand how anti-terror policies impact their lives and principles. The research emphasises the complex interaction between state security measures and the lived realities of Muslim communities, revealing how securitisation narratives often marginalise these groups. By incorporating perspectives from government officials, civil society activists, and Salafi representatives, the study illustrates the challenges and opportunities for dialogue in addressing the concerns of Muslim communities in a securitised environment. Ultimately, this work calls for a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between Islam, security, and democracy, advocating for inclusive policies that recognise the diverse voices within the Muslim population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Abstract (French): Cette recherche étudie la sécurisation des musulmans dans le contexte du système démocratique indonésien, en se concentrant sur les perceptions et les expériences des groupes salafistes. En appliquant une méthodologie ethnographique critique, cette étude amplifie la voix d'un groupe particulier de musulmans en Indonésie, notamment ceux qui se sont distanciés des actions extrémistes, afin de comprendre comment les politiques antiterroristes influencent leur vie et leurs principes. La recherche met l'accent sur l'interaction complexe entre les mesures de sécurité de l'État et les réalités vécues par les communautés musulmanes, révélant comment les discours sécuritaires marginalisent souvent ces groupes. En intégrant les points de vue des responsables gouvernementaux, des militants de la société civile et des représentants salafistes, cette étude illustre les défis et les opportunités du dialogue pour répondre aux préoccupations des communautés musulmanes dans un environnement sécurisé. En fin de compte, ce travail appelle à une compréhension plus nuancée de la relation entre l'islam, la sécurité et la démocratie, en préconisant des politiques inclusives qui reconnaissent la diversité des opinions au sein de la population musulmane. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Social Compass is the property of Sage Publications, Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Databáza: Biomedical Index
Popis
Abstrakt:This research examines the securitisation of Muslims within the context of Indonesia's democratic system, focusing on the perceptions and experiences of Salafi groups. Applying a critical ethnographic methodology, the study amplifies the voices of a particular group of Muslim in Indonesia, particularly those who have distanced themselves from extremist actions, to understand how anti-terror policies impact their lives and principles. The research emphasises the complex interaction between state security measures and the lived realities of Muslim communities, revealing how securitisation narratives often marginalise these groups. By incorporating perspectives from government officials, civil society activists, and Salafi representatives, the study illustrates the challenges and opportunities for dialogue in addressing the concerns of Muslim communities in a securitised environment. Ultimately, this work calls for a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between Islam, security, and democracy, advocating for inclusive policies that recognise the diverse voices within the Muslim population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00377686
DOI:10.1177/00377686251380515