Zobrazit v EDS

Neural Encoding Strategies for Neuromorphic Computing.

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: Neural Encoding Strategies for Neuromorphic Computing.
Autoři: Liu, Michael, Zheng, Honghao, Yi, Yang
Zdroj: Electronics (2079-9292); Mar2026, Vol. 15 Issue 6, p1221, 24p
Abstrakt: Neuromorphic computing seeks to mimic structure and function of biological neural systems to enable energy-efficient, adaptive information processing. A critical component of this paradigm is neural encoding—the translation of analog or digital input data into spike-based representations suitable for spiking neural networks (SNNs). This paper provides a comprehensive overview of major neural encoding schemes used in neuromorphic systems, including rate and temporal encoding, as well as latency, interspike interval, phase, and multiplexed encoding. The purpose of this paper is to explore the use of encoding techniques for deep learning applications. We discussed the underlying principles of spike encoding approaches, their biological inspiration, computational efficiency, power consumption, integrated circuit design and implementation, and suitability for various neuromorphic applications. We also presented our research on a hardware-and-software co-design platform for different encoding schemes and demonstrated their performance. By comparing their strengths, limitations, and implementation challenges, we aim to provide insights that will guide the development of more efficient and application-specific neuromorphic systems. We also performed an encoder performance analysis via Python 3.12 simulations to compare classification accuracies across these spike encoders on three popular image and video datasets. The performance of neural encoders working with both deep neural networks (DNNs) and SNNs is analyzed. Our performance data is largely consistent with the benchmark data on image classification from other papers, while limited performance data on the University of Central Florida's 101 (UCF-101) video dataset were found in comparable studies on spike encoders. Based on our encoder performance data, the Interspike Interval (ISI) encoder performs well across all three datasets, preserving continuous, detailed spike timing and richer temporal information for standard classification tasks. Further, for image classification, multiplexing encoders outperform other spike encoders as they simplify timing patterns by enforcing phase locking and improve stability and robustness to noise. Within the SNN testbenches, the ISI-Phase encoder achieved the highest accuracy on the Modified National Institute of Standards and Technology (MNIST) dataset, surpassing the Time-To-First Spike (TTFS) encoder by 1.9%. On the Canadian Institute For Advanced Research (CIFAR-10) dataset, the ISI encoder achieved the highest accuracy. This ISI encoder had 22.7% higher accuracy than the TTFS encoder on the CIFAR-10 dataset. The ISI encoder performed best on the UCF-101 dataset, achieving 12.7% better performance than the TTFS encoder. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Electronics (2079-9292) is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Databáze: Complementary Index
Popis
Abstrakt:Neuromorphic computing seeks to mimic structure and function of biological neural systems to enable energy-efficient, adaptive information processing. A critical component of this paradigm is neural encoding—the translation of analog or digital input data into spike-based representations suitable for spiking neural networks (SNNs). This paper provides a comprehensive overview of major neural encoding schemes used in neuromorphic systems, including rate and temporal encoding, as well as latency, interspike interval, phase, and multiplexed encoding. The purpose of this paper is to explore the use of encoding techniques for deep learning applications. We discussed the underlying principles of spike encoding approaches, their biological inspiration, computational efficiency, power consumption, integrated circuit design and implementation, and suitability for various neuromorphic applications. We also presented our research on a hardware-and-software co-design platform for different encoding schemes and demonstrated their performance. By comparing their strengths, limitations, and implementation challenges, we aim to provide insights that will guide the development of more efficient and application-specific neuromorphic systems. We also performed an encoder performance analysis via Python 3.12 simulations to compare classification accuracies across these spike encoders on three popular image and video datasets. The performance of neural encoders working with both deep neural networks (DNNs) and SNNs is analyzed. Our performance data is largely consistent with the benchmark data on image classification from other papers, while limited performance data on the University of Central Florida's 101 (UCF-101) video dataset were found in comparable studies on spike encoders. Based on our encoder performance data, the Interspike Interval (ISI) encoder performs well across all three datasets, preserving continuous, detailed spike timing and richer temporal information for standard classification tasks. Further, for image classification, multiplexing encoders outperform other spike encoders as they simplify timing patterns by enforcing phase locking and improve stability and robustness to noise. Within the SNN testbenches, the ISI-Phase encoder achieved the highest accuracy on the Modified National Institute of Standards and Technology (MNIST) dataset, surpassing the Time-To-First Spike (TTFS) encoder by 1.9%. On the Canadian Institute For Advanced Research (CIFAR-10) dataset, the ISI encoder achieved the highest accuracy. This ISI encoder had 22.7% higher accuracy than the TTFS encoder on the CIFAR-10 dataset. The ISI encoder performed best on the UCF-101 dataset, achieving 12.7% better performance than the TTFS encoder. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:20799292
DOI:10.3390/electronics15061221