Zobraziť v EDS

Efficacy of acupuncture versus sham acupuncture on generalized anxiety disorder: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Názov: Efficacy of acupuncture versus sham acupuncture on generalized anxiety disorder: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Autori: Jiang, Hongzhan, Ma, Ruiqing, Huang, Yaxin, Li, Xuejing, Hao, Yufang
Zdroj: Frontiers in Neurology; 2025, p1-12, 12p
Predmety: ACUPUNCTURE, GENERALIZED anxiety disorder, MIND & body therapies, RANDOMIZED controlled trials
Abstrakt: Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the specific efficacy of acupuncture compared to sham acupuncture in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), beyond nonspecific or placebo effects. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, VIP, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov , and EMBASE from inception to October 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing acupuncture with sham acupuncture in adults diagnosed with GAD were included. Primary outcome was the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), with secondary outcomes including Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), cortisol (CORT), and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH). Data were pooled using random- or fixed-effects models based on heterogeneity (I 2). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool, and evidence certainty was evaluated via GRADE. Results: Fourteen RCTs involving 968 participants were included. Acupuncture demonstrated significant reductions in HAMA [MD = −2.71, 95% CI (−4.17, −1.25), p = 0.0003], SAS [MD = −9.33, 95% CI (−16.29, −2.36), p = 0.009], GAD-7 [MD = −2.99, 95% CI (−5.52, −0.45), p = 0.02], PSQI [MD = −2.83, 95% CI (−5.37, −0.28), p = 0.03], and SDS [MD = −11.40, 95% CI (−19.89, −2.92), p = 0.008]. Small but significant effects were observed for CORT (SMD = −0.33, p = 0.007) and ACTH (MD = −3.18, p = 0.04). Heterogeneity was high for most outcomes. Evidence certainty was low to very low for patient-reported outcomes and moderate for biomarkers. Conclusion: Acupuncture is more effective than sham acupuncture in alleviating anxiety symptoms and improving sleep and mood in patients with GAD, though effect sizes are modest and evidence certainty varies. These findings support acupuncture as a potential non-pharmacological option for GAD, yet further high-quality trials are needed to standardize protocols and clarify mechanisms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Frontiers in Neurology is the property of Frontiers Media S.A. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Databáza: Complementary Index
Popis
Abstrakt:Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the specific efficacy of acupuncture compared to sham acupuncture in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), beyond nonspecific or placebo effects. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, VIP, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov , and EMBASE from inception to October 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing acupuncture with sham acupuncture in adults diagnosed with GAD were included. Primary outcome was the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), with secondary outcomes including Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), cortisol (CORT), and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH). Data were pooled using random- or fixed-effects models based on heterogeneity (I <sup>2</sup>). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool, and evidence certainty was evaluated via GRADE. Results: Fourteen RCTs involving 968 participants were included. Acupuncture demonstrated significant reductions in HAMA [MD = −2.71, 95% CI (−4.17, −1.25), p = 0.0003], SAS [MD = −9.33, 95% CI (−16.29, −2.36), p = 0.009], GAD-7 [MD = −2.99, 95% CI (−5.52, −0.45), p = 0.02], PSQI [MD = −2.83, 95% CI (−5.37, −0.28), p = 0.03], and SDS [MD = −11.40, 95% CI (−19.89, −2.92), p = 0.008]. Small but significant effects were observed for CORT (SMD = −0.33, p = 0.007) and ACTH (MD = −3.18, p = 0.04). Heterogeneity was high for most outcomes. Evidence certainty was low to very low for patient-reported outcomes and moderate for biomarkers. Conclusion: Acupuncture is more effective than sham acupuncture in alleviating anxiety symptoms and improving sleep and mood in patients with GAD, though effect sizes are modest and evidence certainty varies. These findings support acupuncture as a potential non-pharmacological option for GAD, yet further high-quality trials are needed to standardize protocols and clarify mechanisms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:16642295
DOI:10.3389/fneur.2025.1682400