Zobrazit v EDS

Do AI agents trump human agency?

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: Do AI agents trump human agency?
Autoři: Astobiza, Aníbal M.
Zdroj: Discover Artificial Intelligence; 11/21/2025, Vol. 5 Issue 1, p1-24, 24p
Témata: COLLECTIVE behavior, COOPERATION, RESOURCE availability (Ecology), AGENT (Philosophy), INTELLIGENT agents, MULTIAGENT systems, SWARM intelligence, DECISION making
Abstrakt: Artificial agents are examined within simulated environments to elucidate the emergence of collective behaviors and decision-making processes under diverse environmental pressures and population structures. Using an Agent-Based Modeling (ABM) framework, the simulation tracked 157,097 iterations across four agent types: cooperators, defectors, super-reciprocators, and free riders; while analyzing 12 core metrics, including alignment indices, coherence, and environmental stress. The results revealed distinct phase transitions in behavior, with low-density populations (d < 0.4) supporting strong consensus formation and higher densities (d > 0.8) leading to fragmentation and increased competition. Agent alignment consistently ranged between 0.28 and 0.37, reflecting partial but stable consensus across conditions. Cooperative behaviors emerged and persisted only when resource availability exceeded a critical threshold (RG ≥ 6), underscoring the role of resource abundance in sustaining collective intelligence. Through interventions such as network topology changes and cognitive plasticity adjustments, agents demonstrated emergent behavioral patterns that arose from their rule-based interactions. It is important to note that these patterns, while complex, do not constitute "sophisticated decision-making" in the sense of genuine intelligence or understanding. Rather, they represent emergent properties of the system, collective behaviors that cannot be reduced to individual agent rules but emerge from their interactions under specific environmental conditions. This distinction is crucial for avoiding misattribution of intelligence to rule-following systems, even when those systems produce complex outputs. These findings provide insights into the mechanisms driving emergent intelligence in artificial systems and their implications for the governance and ethical design of future AI agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Discover Artificial Intelligence is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Databáze: Complementary Index
Popis
Abstrakt:Artificial agents are examined within simulated environments to elucidate the emergence of collective behaviors and decision-making processes under diverse environmental pressures and population structures. Using an Agent-Based Modeling (ABM) framework, the simulation tracked 157,097 iterations across four agent types: cooperators, defectors, super-reciprocators, and free riders; while analyzing 12 core metrics, including alignment indices, coherence, and environmental stress. The results revealed distinct phase transitions in behavior, with low-density populations (d < 0.4) supporting strong consensus formation and higher densities (d > 0.8) leading to fragmentation and increased competition. Agent alignment consistently ranged between 0.28 and 0.37, reflecting partial but stable consensus across conditions. Cooperative behaviors emerged and persisted only when resource availability exceeded a critical threshold (RG ≥ 6), underscoring the role of resource abundance in sustaining collective intelligence. Through interventions such as network topology changes and cognitive plasticity adjustments, agents demonstrated emergent behavioral patterns that arose from their rule-based interactions. It is important to note that these patterns, while complex, do not constitute "sophisticated decision-making" in the sense of genuine intelligence or understanding. Rather, they represent emergent properties of the system, collective behaviors that cannot be reduced to individual agent rules but emerge from their interactions under specific environmental conditions. This distinction is crucial for avoiding misattribution of intelligence to rule-following systems, even when those systems produce complex outputs. These findings provide insights into the mechanisms driving emergent intelligence in artificial systems and their implications for the governance and ethical design of future AI agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:27310809
DOI:10.1007/s44163-025-00608-y