Zobrazit v EDS

Traditional Alginate Impressions vs Digital Optical Impressions Using Reverse-Engineering Technology: A Comparative Study.

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: Traditional Alginate Impressions vs Digital Optical Impressions Using Reverse-Engineering Technology: A Comparative Study.
Autoři: Santilli, Manlio, D'addazio, Gianmaria, Sinjari, Bruna, Tafuri, Giuseppe, Femminella, Beatrice, Caputi, Sergio
Zdroj: International Journal of Prosthodontics; 2025, Vol. 38 Issue 6, p724-733, 10p
Témata: DENTAL impression materials, DIGITAL dental impression systems, MEDICAL practice, STATISTICAL accuracy, DENTAL education, REVERSE engineering
Abstrakt: Purpose: To compare the precision and accuracy of traditional alginate impressions and digital optical impressions taken by second-year dental students using reverse-engineering technology. The null hypothesis posited no significant difference in the accuracy between the two methods when performed by inexperienced operators. Materials and Methods: In total, 20 dental students performed 128 impressions: 64 traditional alginate impressions (Group A) and 64 digital impressions using an intraoral scanner (Group B). The impressions were analyzed and compared to reference models created by an expert operator. Data were captured using a reverse-engineering software (Geomagic Control X), and precision was evaluated through 3D and point-bypoint analyses. Statistical analyses, including paired t tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, were conducted to compare the deviations from the reference model. Results: The digital impressions demonstrated superior accuracy compared to traditional alginate impressions, with significantly smaller deviations from the reference model. Digital impressions consistently exhibited higher precision and trueness, so the null hypothesis was rejected. Statistical significance was found at key points, with P < .05 for all comparisons. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that digital impressions provide significantly greater accuracy and precision than traditional alginate impressions, with lower deviations and higher reproducibility. The findings highlight the dimensional instability of alginate impressions and reinforce the advantages of digital intraoral scanning for standardization and consistency in clinical practice. Intraoral scanners provide more precise and accurate impressions than traditional methods, even when used by inexperienced operators. This study supports the integration of digital impression techniques into dental education to enhance student proficiency and improve clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of International Journal of Prosthodontics is the property of Quintessence Publishing Company Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Databáze: Complementary Index
Popis
Abstrakt:Purpose: To compare the precision and accuracy of traditional alginate impressions and digital optical impressions taken by second-year dental students using reverse-engineering technology. The null hypothesis posited no significant difference in the accuracy between the two methods when performed by inexperienced operators. Materials and Methods: In total, 20 dental students performed 128 impressions: 64 traditional alginate impressions (Group A) and 64 digital impressions using an intraoral scanner (Group B). The impressions were analyzed and compared to reference models created by an expert operator. Data were captured using a reverse-engineering software (Geomagic Control X), and precision was evaluated through 3D and point-bypoint analyses. Statistical analyses, including paired t tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, were conducted to compare the deviations from the reference model. Results: The digital impressions demonstrated superior accuracy compared to traditional alginate impressions, with significantly smaller deviations from the reference model. Digital impressions consistently exhibited higher precision and trueness, so the null hypothesis was rejected. Statistical significance was found at key points, with P < .05 for all comparisons. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that digital impressions provide significantly greater accuracy and precision than traditional alginate impressions, with lower deviations and higher reproducibility. The findings highlight the dimensional instability of alginate impressions and reinforce the advantages of digital intraoral scanning for standardization and consistency in clinical practice. Intraoral scanners provide more precise and accurate impressions than traditional methods, even when used by inexperienced operators. This study supports the integration of digital impression techniques into dental education to enhance student proficiency and improve clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:08932174
DOI:10.11607/ijp.9202