Zobraziť v EDS

Effect of the Number and Angulation of Implants on the Accuracy of Digital Impression in Completely Edentulous Arches.

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Názov: Effect of the Number and Angulation of Implants on the Accuracy of Digital Impression in Completely Edentulous Arches.
Autori: Yuyeon Kim, Donghyun Kim, Hyeonseong Son, Seoung-Jin Hong, Hyeong-Seob Kim, Ahran Pae
Zdroj: International Journal of Prosthodontics; 2025, Vol. 38 Issue 6, p665-676, 12p
Predmety: ARTIFICIAL implants, DENTAL arch, SCANNING systems, STATISTICAL accuracy, DEVIATION (Statistics), THREE-dimensional modeling
Abstrakt: Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of impression methods using an intraoral scanner and the conventional method based on the implant number and angulation with multiple implants. Materials and Methods: Six implants were placed in the maxillary edentulous typodont using 3D-modeling software. Eight implants were placed in another maxillary edentulous typodont. The implant placement angulation for each model was different. 3D designing and printing were performed to produce reference models. These models were scanned to obtain reference scan data (RSD). In the conventional impression method, reference models were used, and a gypsum model was produced. Scan data was obtained by the lab scanner (Group CI). Models were scanned, and the scan data was obtained (Group IS). The distance and angulation deviation were compared. Results: In models with six implants, the mean values of all distance and angulation deviations were less in Group CI than in Group IS (P < .05), except for the distance deviation in Model 6-20. In models with eight implants, the mean values of distance and angulation deviations were less in Group CI than in Group IS, except for the distance deviation in Model 8-20, and significant differences were observed between the two groups for Models 8-0, 8-10, and 8-20 (P < .05). Conclusions: In cases where multiple implants are placed in the completely edentulous arch in vitro, conventional impressions are more accurate than intraoral scans. In cases lacking implant parallelism, intraoral scans can be used as a replacement for conventional impressions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of International Journal of Prosthodontics is the property of Quintessence Publishing Company Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Databáza: Complementary Index
Popis
Abstrakt:Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of impression methods using an intraoral scanner and the conventional method based on the implant number and angulation with multiple implants. Materials and Methods: Six implants were placed in the maxillary edentulous typodont using 3D-modeling software. Eight implants were placed in another maxillary edentulous typodont. The implant placement angulation for each model was different. 3D designing and printing were performed to produce reference models. These models were scanned to obtain reference scan data (RSD). In the conventional impression method, reference models were used, and a gypsum model was produced. Scan data was obtained by the lab scanner (Group CI). Models were scanned, and the scan data was obtained (Group IS). The distance and angulation deviation were compared. Results: In models with six implants, the mean values of all distance and angulation deviations were less in Group CI than in Group IS (P < .05), except for the distance deviation in Model 6-20. In models with eight implants, the mean values of distance and angulation deviations were less in Group CI than in Group IS, except for the distance deviation in Model 8-20, and significant differences were observed between the two groups for Models 8-0, 8-10, and 8-20 (P < .05). Conclusions: In cases where multiple implants are placed in the completely edentulous arch in vitro, conventional impressions are more accurate than intraoral scans. In cases lacking implant parallelism, intraoral scans can be used as a replacement for conventional impressions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:08932174
DOI:10.11607/ijp.9174