Zobraziť v EDS

Comparison of full endoscopic lumbar discectomy combined with and without platelet-rich plasma injections for lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis.

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Názov: Comparison of full endoscopic lumbar discectomy combined with and without platelet-rich plasma injections for lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis.
Autori: Lu, Liangjie, Xiao, Keyi, He, Li-Ru, Chen, Rui-Song, Zeng, Teng-Hui, Lin, Guang-Xun
Zdroj: Asian Spine Journal; Oct2025, Vol. 19 Issue 5, p728-744, 17p
Predmety: PLATELET-rich plasma, INTERVERTEBRAL disk hernias, INTERVERTEBRAL disk, OPERATIVE surgery, ANALGESIA, COMPARATIVE studies, TREATMENT effectiveness
Abstrakt: Study Design: A meta-analysis study Purpose: To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of combining full endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD) with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) administration versus FELD alone in treating lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Overview of Literature: FELD is effective for LDH, but PRP may enhance healing; evidence comparing both remains unclear. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data up to December 20, 2023. Primary outcomes included postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores. Secondary outcomes included disc height, complications, and Pfirrmann grade of disc degeneration. Results: Six studies involving 433 patients were included (214 undergoing FELD combined with PRP and 219 undergoing FELD alone). Patients in the FELD+PRP group had significantly lower VAS scores for back pain after surgery compared to the FELD group (p<0.05). JOA and ODI scores showed significantly better improvement in the FELD+PRP group than in the FELD group (p<0.05). Compared to the FELD group, the FELD+PRP group had less disc height loss and a lower complication rate (p=0.0005). There was a significantly better improvement in disc degeneration (based on Pfirrmann grading) at final follow-up in the FELD+PRP group compared to the FELD group (p=0.002). Conclusions: The combination of FELD and PRP offers superior outcomes compared to FELD alone in the treatment of LDH, including a more pronounced relief from back pain, significant functional improvement, and fewer postoperative complications. Additionally, it facilitates the repair of the annulus fibrosus of the intervertebral disc and reduces the loss of disc height. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Asian Spine Journal is the property of Korean Society of Spine Surgery and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Databáza: Complementary Index
Popis
Abstrakt:Study Design: A meta-analysis study Purpose: To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of combining full endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD) with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) administration versus FELD alone in treating lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Overview of Literature: FELD is effective for LDH, but PRP may enhance healing; evidence comparing both remains unclear. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data up to December 20, 2023. Primary outcomes included postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores. Secondary outcomes included disc height, complications, and Pfirrmann grade of disc degeneration. Results: Six studies involving 433 patients were included (214 undergoing FELD combined with PRP and 219 undergoing FELD alone). Patients in the FELD+PRP group had significantly lower VAS scores for back pain after surgery compared to the FELD group (p<0.05). JOA and ODI scores showed significantly better improvement in the FELD+PRP group than in the FELD group (p<0.05). Compared to the FELD group, the FELD+PRP group had less disc height loss and a lower complication rate (p=0.0005). There was a significantly better improvement in disc degeneration (based on Pfirrmann grading) at final follow-up in the FELD+PRP group compared to the FELD group (p=0.002). Conclusions: The combination of FELD and PRP offers superior outcomes compared to FELD alone in the treatment of LDH, including a more pronounced relief from back pain, significant functional improvement, and fewer postoperative complications. Additionally, it facilitates the repair of the annulus fibrosus of the intervertebral disc and reduces the loss of disc height. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:19761902
DOI:10.31616/asj.2024.0243