Zobraziť v EDS

Fairness consensus adjustment and bifocal expert weight integration in multi-attribute group decision-making with parallel expert evaluation systems.

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Názov: Fairness consensus adjustment and bifocal expert weight integration in multi-attribute group decision-making with parallel expert evaluation systems.
Autori: Liu, Jinpei, Xu, Rong, Xu, Wenqing, Shao, Longlong
Zdroj: Applied Intelligence; Nov2025, Vol. 55 Issue 17, p1-20, 20p
Predmety: MONTE Carlo method, DATA envelopment analysis, RISK aversion, BAYESIAN analysis, MULTIPLE criteria decision making, SENSITIVITY analysis
Abstrakt: Multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) constitutes a pivotal methodology for resolving complex problems requiring collective expertise. However, critical limitations persist in current frameworks, including overreliance on unilateral expert weight strategies that neglect the interplay between informational objectivity and social influence, treatment of evaluation systems as structural "black boxes", unrealistic assumptions regarding perfect expert rationality, and inequitable modification of opinions during consensus building. To address these issues, this study develops an integrated MAGDM framework that incorporates three synergistic innovations. First, we introduce a hybrid weighting mechanism that combines information entropy and quantum Bayesian networks (QBNs) to quantify the interference effects of trust propagation, and solve the combination ratio through Monte Carlo simulation. Second, a fair consensus adjustment model is constructed to optimize the distribution of opinion revisions and balance consensus reaching with the retention of original opinions. Third, to characterize experts' risk-avoidance behavior and evaluate the internal structure and behavioral characteristics of the system, we design a parallel data envelopment analysis (DEA) cross-efficiency model and a regret-based perceived utility value (PUV). Finally, an illustrative example is presented to validate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, while its robustness and superiority are demonstrated through sensitivity analysis and comparative experiments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Applied Intelligence is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Databáza: Complementary Index
Popis
Abstrakt:Multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) constitutes a pivotal methodology for resolving complex problems requiring collective expertise. However, critical limitations persist in current frameworks, including overreliance on unilateral expert weight strategies that neglect the interplay between informational objectivity and social influence, treatment of evaluation systems as structural "black boxes", unrealistic assumptions regarding perfect expert rationality, and inequitable modification of opinions during consensus building. To address these issues, this study develops an integrated MAGDM framework that incorporates three synergistic innovations. First, we introduce a hybrid weighting mechanism that combines information entropy and quantum Bayesian networks (QBNs) to quantify the interference effects of trust propagation, and solve the combination ratio through Monte Carlo simulation. Second, a fair consensus adjustment model is constructed to optimize the distribution of opinion revisions and balance consensus reaching with the retention of original opinions. Third, to characterize experts' risk-avoidance behavior and evaluate the internal structure and behavioral characteristics of the system, we design a parallel data envelopment analysis (DEA) cross-efficiency model and a regret-based perceived utility value (PUV). Finally, an illustrative example is presented to validate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, while its robustness and superiority are demonstrated through sensitivity analysis and comparative experiments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:0924669X
DOI:10.1007/s10489-025-06942-z