Zobrazit v EDS

ZAKAJ EKTOGENEZA NI REŠITEV "ŽENSKEGA VPRAŠANJA"?*.

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: ZAKAJ EKTOGENEZA NI REŠITEV "ŽENSKEGA VPRAŠANJA"?*. (Slovenian)
Alternate Title: WHY ECTOGENESIS DOES NOT SOLVE THE 'WOMEN'S QUESTION'. (English)
Autoři: MARIČ, Mojca, GODINA, Vesna V.
Zdroj: Teorija in Praksa; 2025, Vol. 62 Issue 3, p557-578, 22p
Témata: REPRODUCTIVE technology, SEX discrimination against women, SOCIAL constructionism, COMPARATIVE studies, SURROGATE motherhood, CHILD care, PATRIARCHY, PARENTHOOD
Abstract (English): It is argued in the text that changes in reproductive technologies, for example ectogenesis, are not automatically connected with the elimination of female subordination and discrimination. This contention is supported by eight groups of arguments: no unilinear connection exists between technology and other characteristics of society; the use of technology is culturally defined; patriarchy is not universal; not all women are subordinated; the gender of motherhood is not exclusively female; child-care is not only provided to children and newborn babies by biological mothers; and arguments based on biologics. The presented thesis is supported with data collected using two basic methods, comparative analysis of the literature, and comparative analysis of Western and non-European societies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Abstract (Slovenian): Temeljena teza pričujočega teksta je, da spremembe reprodukcijskih tehnologij, na primer ektogeneza, ne prinašajo samodejno tudi ukinitve podrejenosti in diskriminacije žensk. Ta teza je podprta z osmimi skupinami argumentov: unilinearna povezanost med tehnologijo in drugimi značilnostmi družb ne obstaja; uporaba tehnologije je kulturno določena; patriarhat ni univerzalen; niso vse ženske v vseh družbah podrejene; otrok ne rojevajo le ženske; nimamo le ene mame; skrbstveno delo za otroke; biologika.Teza je podprta s podatki, zbranimi z dvema temeljnima metodama, s primerjalno analizo literature in primerjalno analizo zahodnih in neevropskih družb. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Teorija in Praksa is the property of Teorija in Praksa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Databáze: Complementary Index
Popis
Abstrakt:It is argued in the text that changes in reproductive technologies, for example ectogenesis, are not automatically connected with the elimination of female subordination and discrimination. This contention is supported by eight groups of arguments: no unilinear connection exists between technology and other characteristics of society; the use of technology is culturally defined; patriarchy is not universal; not all women are subordinated; the gender of motherhood is not exclusively female; child-care is not only provided to children and newborn babies by biological mothers; and arguments based on biologics. The presented thesis is supported with data collected using two basic methods, comparative analysis of the literature, and comparative analysis of Western and non-European societies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00403598
DOI:10.51936/tip.62.3.557