Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool for Athletes.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Titel: Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool for Athletes.
Autoren: Yazgan, Elif Aleyna, Karagözoğlu Coşkunsu, Dilber, Özdinçler, Arzu Razak
Quelle: Journal of Sport Rehabilitation; Nov2025, Vol. 34 Issue 8, p871-877, 7p
Schlagwörter: REFERENCE values, MULTITRAIT multimethod techniques, STATISTICAL correlation, SELF-evaluation, CRONBACH'S alpha, DATA analysis, SOCCER, RECEIVER operating characteristic curves, RESEARCH methodology evaluation, RESEARCH evaluation, QUESTIONNAIRES, CHRONIC ankle instability, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, RESEARCH methodology, RESEARCH, STATISTICAL reliability, INTRACLASS correlation, STATISTICS, PSYCHOMETRICS, BASKETBALL, CONFIDENCE intervals, DATA analysis software, DISCRIMINANT analysis, VOLLEYBALL, ACTIVITIES of daily living, EVALUATION
Geografische Kategorien: TURKEY
Abstract: Context: To cross-cultural translate the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) to Turkish version (CAIT-T) and to evaluate the validity, reliability, and cutoff score of CAIT-T for Turkish athletic population. Design: The English version of CAIT was translated to CAIT-T based on a guideline of cross-cultural adaptation. Fifty-two athletes with chronic ankle instability and 63 athletes without chronic ankle instability were included in the study. Construct validity was evaluated with correlations between the CAIT-T, Turkish version of Foot Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM-T), and Numeric Rating Scale. CAIT-T was completed twice by each participant at 7 to 10 days intervals to assess test–retest reliability based on the intraclass correlation coefficient, whereas Cronbach alpha evaluated internal consistency. Discriminative validity and content validity of the CAIT-T also evaluated. Results: In construct validity, strong positive correlation was found between CAIT-T and Numeric Rating Scale perceived ankle instability (rho = −.771, P <.001), as well as moderate negative correlations with FAAM-T-activities of daily living and FAAM-T-sports (rho = −.448, P <.001 and rho = −0.541, P <.001, respectively). The CAIT-T demonstrated strong test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient score of.98) with a good internal consistency (Cronbach α:.85). Receiver operating characteristic curve showed a cutoff score of 26.5 (Youden index: 0.78, sensitivity: 0.57, specificity: 0.90.5). No ceiling or floor effects were observed. Conclusions: CAIT-T is a valid and reliable questionnaire for the assessment of chronic ankle instability in the Turkish athletic population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Sport Rehabilitation is the property of Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Datenbank: Complementary Index
Beschreibung
Abstract:Context: To cross-cultural translate the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) to Turkish version (CAIT-T) and to evaluate the validity, reliability, and cutoff score of CAIT-T for Turkish athletic population. Design: The English version of CAIT was translated to CAIT-T based on a guideline of cross-cultural adaptation. Fifty-two athletes with chronic ankle instability and 63 athletes without chronic ankle instability were included in the study. Construct validity was evaluated with correlations between the CAIT-T, Turkish version of Foot Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM-T), and Numeric Rating Scale. CAIT-T was completed twice by each participant at 7 to 10 days intervals to assess test–retest reliability based on the intraclass correlation coefficient, whereas Cronbach alpha evaluated internal consistency. Discriminative validity and content validity of the CAIT-T also evaluated. Results: In construct validity, strong positive correlation was found between CAIT-T and Numeric Rating Scale perceived ankle instability (rho = −.771, P <.001), as well as moderate negative correlations with FAAM-T-activities of daily living and FAAM-T-sports (rho = −.448, P <.001 and rho = −0.541, P <.001, respectively). The CAIT-T demonstrated strong test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient score of.98) with a good internal consistency (Cronbach α:.85). Receiver operating characteristic curve showed a cutoff score of 26.5 (Youden index: 0.78, sensitivity: 0.57, specificity: 0.90.5). No ceiling or floor effects were observed. Conclusions: CAIT-T is a valid and reliable questionnaire for the assessment of chronic ankle instability in the Turkish athletic population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:10566716
DOI:10.1123/jsr.2024-0385