Zobraziť v EDS

Effect of Components and Delivery Modes of Digital Health Interventions Targeting Physical Activity in People With a Chronic Condition or Multimorbidity: A Systematic Review and Component Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Názov: Effect of Components and Delivery Modes of Digital Health Interventions Targeting Physical Activity in People With a Chronic Condition or Multimorbidity: A Systematic Review and Component Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Autori: Nøhr, Nikolaj, Zangger, Graziella, Buch Dalum, Frederik, Skou, Søren T., Juhl, Carsten, Bricca, Alessio
Zdroj: Journal of Physical Activity & Health; Oct2025, Vol. 22 Issue 10, p1209-1217, 9p
Predmety: PHYSICAL activity, CHRONIC diseases, SELF-management (Psychology), TECHNOLOGY convergence, DIGITAL health, MEDICAL care research, RANDOMIZED controlled trials
Abstrakt: Background: Digital health interventions targeting physical activity in individuals with chronic conditions are increasingly common. However, the effectiveness of their components and delivery modes remains unclear. This review assessed the effects of intervention components to guide future approaches. Methods: A systematic review and component network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to March 14, 2024. Random effects models, subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and meta-regression were performed. The Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis framework was used to assess the certainty of the evidence. Results: A total of 137 randomized controlled trials (18,443 participants) were included. Exercise combined with self-management was more effective than usual care (standardized mean differences [SMD]: 0.39; 95% CI, 0.20–0.58) and minimal self-management (SMD: 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23–0.60), as was self-management alone compared with usual care (SMD: 0.27; 95% CI, 0.17–0.37), and minimal self-management (SMD: 0.29; 95% CI, 0.17–0.42). Interventions using mixed technologies (eg, apps with phone calls or devices) (SMD: 0.35; 95% CI, 0.26–0.44), web/app platforms (SMD: 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18–0.45), and phone calls (SMD: 0.21; 95% CI, 0.07–0.36) were more effective than minimal or in-person controls. Type 2 diabetes patients showed the greatest increase in physical activity, while musculoskeletal conditions showed the least. Certainty of evidence was moderate for most comparisons, except for phone calls, which had low certainty. Conclusions: The most effective digital health interventions for promoting physical activity in individuals with chronic conditions include exercise combined with self-management, delivered via mixed technologies, or web/app platforms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Physical Activity & Health is the property of Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Databáza: Complementary Index
Popis
Abstrakt:Background: Digital health interventions targeting physical activity in individuals with chronic conditions are increasingly common. However, the effectiveness of their components and delivery modes remains unclear. This review assessed the effects of intervention components to guide future approaches. Methods: A systematic review and component network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to March 14, 2024. Random effects models, subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and meta-regression were performed. The Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis framework was used to assess the certainty of the evidence. Results: A total of 137 randomized controlled trials (18,443 participants) were included. Exercise combined with self-management was more effective than usual care (standardized mean differences [SMD]: 0.39; 95% CI, 0.20–0.58) and minimal self-management (SMD: 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23–0.60), as was self-management alone compared with usual care (SMD: 0.27; 95% CI, 0.17–0.37), and minimal self-management (SMD: 0.29; 95% CI, 0.17–0.42). Interventions using mixed technologies (eg, apps with phone calls or devices) (SMD: 0.35; 95% CI, 0.26–0.44), web/app platforms (SMD: 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18–0.45), and phone calls (SMD: 0.21; 95% CI, 0.07–0.36) were more effective than minimal or in-person controls. Type 2 diabetes patients showed the greatest increase in physical activity, while musculoskeletal conditions showed the least. Certainty of evidence was moderate for most comparisons, except for phone calls, which had low certainty. Conclusions: The most effective digital health interventions for promoting physical activity in individuals with chronic conditions include exercise combined with self-management, delivered via mixed technologies, or web/app platforms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:15433080
DOI:10.1123/jpah.2025-0014