In EDS ansehen

Best practices for machine learning strategies aimed at process parameter development in powder bed fusion additive manufacturing.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Titel: Best practices for machine learning strategies aimed at process parameter development in powder bed fusion additive manufacturing.
Autoren: Samadiani, Najmeh, Barnard, Amanda S., Gunasegaram, Dayalan, Fayyazifar, Najmeh
Quelle: Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing; Oct2025, Vol. 36 Issue 7, p4477-4517, 41p
Schlagwörter: MACHINE learning, BEST practices, MATHEMATICAL optimization, THREE-dimensional printing, SELECTIVE laser melting, STANDARDS, DATA science
Abstract: The process parameters used for building a part utilizing the powder-bed fusion (PBF) additive manufacturing (AM) system have a direct influence on the quality—and therefore performance—of the final object. These parameters are commonly chosen based on experience or, in many cases, iteratively through experimentation. Discovering the optimal set of parameters via trial and error can be time-consuming and costly, as it often requires examining numerous permutations and combinations of parameters which commonly have complex interactions. However, machine learning (ML) methods can recommend suitable processing windows using models trained on data. They achieve this by efficiently identifying the optimal parameters through analyzing and recognizing patterns in data described by a multi-dimensional parameter space. We reviewed ML-based forward and inverse models that have been proposed to unlock the process–structure–property–performance relationships in both directions and assessed them in relation to data (quality, quantity, and diversity), ML method (mismatches and neglect of history), and model evaluation. To address the common shortcomings inherent in the published works, we propose strategies that embrace best practices. We point out the need for consistency in the reporting of details relevant to ML models and advocate for the development of relevant international standards. Significantly, our recommendations can be adopted for ML applications outside of AM where an optimum combination of process parameters (or other inputs) must be found with only a limited amount of training data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Datenbank: Complementary Index
Beschreibung
Abstract:The process parameters used for building a part utilizing the powder-bed fusion (PBF) additive manufacturing (AM) system have a direct influence on the quality—and therefore performance—of the final object. These parameters are commonly chosen based on experience or, in many cases, iteratively through experimentation. Discovering the optimal set of parameters via trial and error can be time-consuming and costly, as it often requires examining numerous permutations and combinations of parameters which commonly have complex interactions. However, machine learning (ML) methods can recommend suitable processing windows using models trained on data. They achieve this by efficiently identifying the optimal parameters through analyzing and recognizing patterns in data described by a multi-dimensional parameter space. We reviewed ML-based forward and inverse models that have been proposed to unlock the process–structure–property–performance relationships in both directions and assessed them in relation to data (quality, quantity, and diversity), ML method (mismatches and neglect of history), and model evaluation. To address the common shortcomings inherent in the published works, we propose strategies that embrace best practices. We point out the need for consistency in the reporting of details relevant to ML models and advocate for the development of relevant international standards. Significantly, our recommendations can be adopted for ML applications outside of AM where an optimum combination of process parameters (or other inputs) must be found with only a limited amount of training data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:09565515
DOI:10.1007/s10845-024-02490-4