Characterizing the response time of unpumped oxygen optodes for profiling applications.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Characterizing the response time of unpumped oxygen optodes for profiling applications.
Authors: Park, Ellen, Nicholson, David, Dever, Mathieu, Atamanchuk, Dariia, Richards, Clark
Source: Limnology & Oceanography, Methods; Sep2025, Vol. 23 Issue 9, p652-672, 21p
Subject Terms: OPTODES, OXYGEN detectors, DETECTORS, ACQUISITION of data, THERMAL stability
Abstract: The response times of the Aanderaa 4330, Aanderaa 4330 WTW, RBRcoda T.ODO|slow, and PyroScience PICO‐O2‐SUB were evaluated in the laboratory over a range of profiling speeds at two temperatures. The PyroScience PICO‐O2‐SUB had the fastest response time (1–4 s), followed by the RBRcoda T.ODO|slow (~ 15–35 s), Aanderaa 4330 (~ 30–60 s), and Aanderaa 4330W (~ 50–100 s). This study provides recommendations on improving the quality of oxygen data from optodes in profiling applications by additionally assessing the impact of response time testing setups, thermal inertia effects, and foil types on sensor response times. This study provides a new response time function based on physical principles to predict response time for these four optode types. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Limnology & Oceanography, Methods is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Complementary Index
Description
Abstract:The response times of the Aanderaa 4330, Aanderaa 4330 WTW, RBRcoda T.ODO|slow, and PyroScience PICO‐O2‐SUB were evaluated in the laboratory over a range of profiling speeds at two temperatures. The PyroScience PICO‐O2‐SUB had the fastest response time (1–4 s), followed by the RBRcoda T.ODO|slow (~ 15–35 s), Aanderaa 4330 (~ 30–60 s), and Aanderaa 4330W (~ 50–100 s). This study provides recommendations on improving the quality of oxygen data from optodes in profiling applications by additionally assessing the impact of response time testing setups, thermal inertia effects, and foil types on sensor response times. This study provides a new response time function based on physical principles to predict response time for these four optode types. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:15415856
DOI:10.1002/lom3.10711