In EDS ansehen

Optimizing Source-Control Systems for Ammonia Mitigation in Swine Manure Pits: Performance Assessment and Modeling.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Titel: Optimizing Source-Control Systems for Ammonia Mitigation in Swine Manure Pits: Performance Assessment and Modeling.
Autoren: Ahn, Byung-kyu, Kim, Tae-Hoon, Lee, Jung-Sup, Lee, Chang-Kyu, Yun, Yeo-Myeong
Quelle: Agriculture; Basel; Sep2025, Vol. 15 Issue 17, p1847, 19p
Schlagwörter: SWINE manure, FOAM, BELT conveyors, ENVIRONMENTAL impact analysis, WASTE management equipment, OPERATIONS research, ODOR control
Abstract: Ammonia (NH3) emissions from swine manure pits contribute significantly to odor nuisance, health risks, and secondary PM2.5 formation. This study assessed the pilot-scale performance of three source-control technologies: surface sealing with surfactant-based foam system (FOAM SYSTEM), swine manure wiping and removing system (WIPING SYSTEM), and belt-conveyor-based solid–liquid separator system (BELT SYSTEM). Each technology targets a different pathway in the ammonia generation process. The FOAM SYSTEM suppresses volatilization by forming a foam barrier at the air–liquid interface. The WIPING SYSTEM reduces precursor contact time by periodically removing feces. The BELT SYSTEM separates feces and urine upon excretion, inhibiting enzymatic ammonia formation. Among the individual systems, the BELT SYSTEM achieved the highest ammonia reduction efficiency of 91.7%, followed by the FOAM SYSTEM (73.6%) and WIPING SYSTEM (64.4%). The combined FOAM SYSTEM + BELT SYSTEM yielded the best performance with an ammonia reduction efficiency of 94.4%, showing modest synergy without operational interference. In contrast, the FOAM SYSTEM + WIPING SYSTEM configuration achieved 71.1%, slightly lower than the FOAM SYSTEM alone, likely due to foam disruption. Environmental sensitivity tests revealed that higher temperatures and alkaline pH elevated NH3 emissions, whereas systems that maintained near-neutral pH, like the FOAM SYSTEM, demonstrated greater stability. These findings highlight the importance of integrating physical and source-control mechanisms while considering environmental variability for effective on-farm ammonia mitigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Agriculture; Basel is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Datenbank: Complementary Index
Beschreibung
Abstract:Ammonia (NH<subscript>3</subscript>) emissions from swine manure pits contribute significantly to odor nuisance, health risks, and secondary PM<subscript>2.5</subscript> formation. This study assessed the pilot-scale performance of three source-control technologies: surface sealing with surfactant-based foam system (FOAM SYSTEM), swine manure wiping and removing system (WIPING SYSTEM), and belt-conveyor-based solid–liquid separator system (BELT SYSTEM). Each technology targets a different pathway in the ammonia generation process. The FOAM SYSTEM suppresses volatilization by forming a foam barrier at the air–liquid interface. The WIPING SYSTEM reduces precursor contact time by periodically removing feces. The BELT SYSTEM separates feces and urine upon excretion, inhibiting enzymatic ammonia formation. Among the individual systems, the BELT SYSTEM achieved the highest ammonia reduction efficiency of 91.7%, followed by the FOAM SYSTEM (73.6%) and WIPING SYSTEM (64.4%). The combined FOAM SYSTEM + BELT SYSTEM yielded the best performance with an ammonia reduction efficiency of 94.4%, showing modest synergy without operational interference. In contrast, the FOAM SYSTEM + WIPING SYSTEM configuration achieved 71.1%, slightly lower than the FOAM SYSTEM alone, likely due to foam disruption. Environmental sensitivity tests revealed that higher temperatures and alkaline pH elevated NH<subscript>3</subscript> emissions, whereas systems that maintained near-neutral pH, like the FOAM SYSTEM, demonstrated greater stability. These findings highlight the importance of integrating physical and source-control mechanisms while considering environmental variability for effective on-farm ammonia mitigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:20770472
DOI:10.3390/agriculture15171847