In EDS ansehen

CriteriaChecker: a knowledge graph approach to enhance integrity and ethics in academic publication.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Titel: CriteriaChecker: a knowledge graph approach to enhance integrity and ethics in academic publication.
Autoren: Sharma, Garima, Tripathi, Vikas, Singh, Vijay
Quelle: Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science; Aug2025, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p973-986, 14p
Schlagwörter: KNOWLEDGE graphs, ETHICS, RESEARCH evaluation, GRAPH theory, EDUCATION ethics, FORGERY prevention, SCHOLARLY publishing
Abstract: Academic writing is an integral part of scientific communities. This is a formal style of writing used by researchers and scholars to communicate critical analysis and evidence based arguments. This work showcased a graph-based approach for scraping, extracting, representing and evaluating the available academic writing forgery detection criteria and further enhancing the model by proposing a set of new age criteria. The proposed work is based on knowledge graphs and graph analytics capable of selecting subset of 16 criteria from the available superset of a cent of criterias provided by Bealls, Cabells, Shreshtha, and Think.Check.Submit, Scopus, and other relevant authors. The process for detecting the influencial parameters consists of 04 phases: dataset preparation, knowledge graph representation and making inferences through graph analytics and evaluation of results. The experimental results are then compared to the retraction database that consisting of information about retracted articles. The work enables the construction of an experiential knowledge graph that effectively identifies influential criteria, enhancing this list by incorporating new age criteria into current influential set and concluding in result by successfully detecting the academic predatory behavior. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science is the property of Institute of Advanced Engineering & Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Datenbank: Complementary Index
Beschreibung
Abstract:Academic writing is an integral part of scientific communities. This is a formal style of writing used by researchers and scholars to communicate critical analysis and evidence based arguments. This work showcased a graph-based approach for scraping, extracting, representing and evaluating the available academic writing forgery detection criteria and further enhancing the model by proposing a set of new age criteria. The proposed work is based on knowledge graphs and graph analytics capable of selecting subset of 16 criteria from the available superset of a cent of criterias provided by Bealls, Cabells, Shreshtha, and Think.Check.Submit, Scopus, and other relevant authors. The process for detecting the influencial parameters consists of 04 phases: dataset preparation, knowledge graph representation and making inferences through graph analytics and evaluation of results. The experimental results are then compared to the retraction database that consisting of information about retracted articles. The work enables the construction of an experiential knowledge graph that effectively identifies influential criteria, enhancing this list by incorporating new age criteria into current influential set and concluding in result by successfully detecting the academic predatory behavior. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:25024752
DOI:10.11591/ijeecs.v39.i2.pp973-986