Hybrid protein–ligand binding residue prediction with protein language models: does the structure matter?.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Hybrid protein–ligand binding residue prediction with protein language models: does the structure matter?.
Authors: Gamouh, Hamza, Novotný, Marian, Hoksza, David
Source: Bioinformatics; Aug2025, Vol. 41 Issue 8, p1-14, 14p
Subject Terms: LIGAND binding (Biochemistry), GRAPH neural networks, FORECASTING, DEEP learning, STRUCTURAL bioinformatics, THREE-dimensional modeling, BIOTECHNOLOGY, INTERDISCIPLINARY research
Abstract: Motivation Predicting protein–ligand binding sites is crucial in studying protein interactions with applications in biotechnology and drug discovery. Two distinct paradigms have emerged for this purpose: sequence-based methods, which leverage protein sequence information, and structure-based methods, which rely on the three-dimensional (3D) structure of the protein. Here, we analyze a hybrid approach that combines the strengths of both paradigms by integrating two recent deep learning architectures: protein language models (pLMs) from the sequence-based paradigm and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) from the structure-based paradigm. Specifically, we construct a residue-level Graph Attention Network (GAT) model based on the protein's 3D structure that uses pre-trained pLM embeddings as node features. This integration enables us to study the interplay between the sequential information encoded in the protein sequence and the spatial relationships within the protein structure on the model performance. Results By exploiting a benchmark dataset over a range of ligands and ligand types, we have shown that using the structure information consistently enhances the predictive power of the baselines in absolute terms. Nevertheless, as more complex pLMs are used to represent node features, the relative impact of the structure information represented by the GNN architecture diminishes. The above observations suggest that although the use of the experimental protein structure almost always improves the accuracy of the prediction of the binding site, complex pLMs still contain structural information that leads to good predictive performance even without the use of 3D structure. Availability and implementation The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study, as well as pretrained models, are available in the following Zenodo link https://zenodo.org/records/15184302. The source code that was used to generate the results of the current study is available in the following GitHub repository https://github.com/hamzagamouh/pt-lm-gnn as well as in the following Zenodo link https://zenodo.org/records/15192327. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Bioinformatics is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Complementary Index
Description
Abstract:Motivation Predicting protein–ligand binding sites is crucial in studying protein interactions with applications in biotechnology and drug discovery. Two distinct paradigms have emerged for this purpose: sequence-based methods, which leverage protein sequence information, and structure-based methods, which rely on the three-dimensional (3D) structure of the protein. Here, we analyze a hybrid approach that combines the strengths of both paradigms by integrating two recent deep learning architectures: protein language models (pLMs) from the sequence-based paradigm and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) from the structure-based paradigm. Specifically, we construct a residue-level Graph Attention Network (GAT) model based on the protein's 3D structure that uses pre-trained pLM embeddings as node features. This integration enables us to study the interplay between the sequential information encoded in the protein sequence and the spatial relationships within the protein structure on the model performance. Results By exploiting a benchmark dataset over a range of ligands and ligand types, we have shown that using the structure information consistently enhances the predictive power of the baselines in absolute terms. Nevertheless, as more complex pLMs are used to represent node features, the relative impact of the structure information represented by the GNN architecture diminishes. The above observations suggest that although the use of the experimental protein structure almost always improves the accuracy of the prediction of the binding site, complex pLMs still contain structural information that leads to good predictive performance even without the use of 3D structure. Availability and implementation The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study, as well as pretrained models, are available in the following Zenodo link https://zenodo.org/records/15184302. The source code that was used to generate the results of the current study is available in the following GitHub repository https://github.com/hamzagamouh/pt-lm-gnn as well as in the following Zenodo link https://zenodo.org/records/15192327. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:13674803
DOI:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf431