View in EDS

Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence as a Teaching Strategy Among University Professors: The Role of Habit, Hedonic Motivation, and Competence for Technology Integration.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence as a Teaching Strategy Among University Professors: The Role of Habit, Hedonic Motivation, and Competence for Technology Integration.
Authors: Acosta-Enriquez, Benicio Gonzalo, Villena Zapata, Luigi Italo, Huamaní Jordan, Olger, López Roca, Carlos, Cabrera Cipirán, Betty Margarita, Saavedra Villacrez, Willy, Arbulu Perez Vargas, Carmen Graciela, S., Maheswaran
Source: Human Behavior & Emerging Technologies; 7/31/2025, Vol. 2025, p1-22, 22p
Subject Terms: ARTIFICIAL intelligence, COLLEGE teachers, TEACHING methods, EXPERTISE, MOTIVATION (Psychology), ATTITUDE change (Psychology), HIGHER education, EDUCATIONAL technology
Geographic Terms: PERU (Viceroyalty)
Abstract: The immersion of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education presents significant challenges and opportunities. This study examines the acceptance of AI as a teaching strategy among university teachers, following the extended UTAUT2 model with the inclusion of the teacher skills and knowledge for technology integration (SKTI) construct. Employing a quantitative cross‐sectional research design, data were collected from 318 university teachers with prior experience using AI as a learning strategy through nonprobabilistic convenience sampling across 10 universities in northern Peru. Participants completed an online survey, and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Kruskal–Wallis tests with Dunn's post hoc comparisons, and partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS‐SEM). The results showed that performance expectancy (β = 0.129∗∗), hedonic motivation (β = 0.167∗∗), habit (β = 0.405∗∗∗), and SKTI (β = 0.263∗∗∗) had a positive influence on the behavioral intention to adopt AI as a teaching strategy. Additionally, behavioral intention (β = 0.303∗∗∗), facilitating conditions (β = 0.115∗), and habit (β = 0.464∗∗) determine the behavioral use of AI by teachers. The Kruskal–Wallis test revealed significant differences among age groups in the performance expectancy, social influence, habit, and behavioral intention constructs, with the 37‐ to 48‐year‐old age group showing higher average ranks. The discussion highlights that these findings suggest a positive adoption of AI among teachers, driven by individual and contextual factors, and challenges assumptions about the relevance of certain constructs in this specific context. In conclusion, this study represents a significant advancement in understanding the adoption of AI in university teaching and provides valuable guidance for practical implementation efforts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Human Behavior & Emerging Technologies is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Complementary Index
Description
Abstract:The immersion of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education presents significant challenges and opportunities. This study examines the acceptance of AI as a teaching strategy among university teachers, following the extended UTAUT2 model with the inclusion of the teacher skills and knowledge for technology integration (SKTI) construct. Employing a quantitative cross‐sectional research design, data were collected from 318 university teachers with prior experience using AI as a learning strategy through nonprobabilistic convenience sampling across 10 universities in northern Peru. Participants completed an online survey, and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Kruskal–Wallis tests with Dunn's post hoc comparisons, and partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS‐SEM). The results showed that performance expectancy (β = 0.129∗∗), hedonic motivation (β = 0.167∗∗), habit (β = 0.405∗∗∗), and SKTI (β = 0.263∗∗∗) had a positive influence on the behavioral intention to adopt AI as a teaching strategy. Additionally, behavioral intention (β = 0.303∗∗∗), facilitating conditions (β = 0.115∗), and habit (β = 0.464∗∗) determine the behavioral use of AI by teachers. The Kruskal–Wallis test revealed significant differences among age groups in the performance expectancy, social influence, habit, and behavioral intention constructs, with the 37‐ to 48‐year‐old age group showing higher average ranks. The discussion highlights that these findings suggest a positive adoption of AI among teachers, driven by individual and contextual factors, and challenges assumptions about the relevance of certain constructs in this specific context. In conclusion, this study represents a significant advancement in understanding the adoption of AI in university teaching and provides valuable guidance for practical implementation efforts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:25781863
DOI:10.1155/hbe2/5933157