Wieloaspektowa analiza porównawcza szkieletów programistycznych języka JavaScript - React.js i Solid.js.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Titel: Wieloaspektowa analiza porównawcza szkieletów programistycznych języka JavaScript - React.js i Solid.js. (Polish)
Alternate Title: Multi-aspect comparative analysis of JavaScript programming frameworks - React.js and Solid.js. (English)
Autoren: Kryk, Jakub, Plechawska-Wójcik, Małgorzata
Quelle: Journal of Computer Sciences Institute; 2025, Vol. 34, p68-75, 8p
Schlagwörter: LIBRARY marketing, PHYSICALLY active people, WEB-based user interfaces, COMPARATIVE studies, ECOSYSTEMS
Abstract (English): Every year, new frameworks and programming libraries appear on the market, trying to gain user interest by presenting their advantages over the competition. The purpose of this article was to compare many aspects of one if such modern solution, i.e. the Solid.js library with a tool recognized on the market, the React.js library, in order to be able to form an opinion on the better choice for a programmer in 2024. The comparative analysis was divided into two parts - performance and theoretical. The research showed Solid.js' performance advantage, but also highlighted its immature ecosystem and limited number of active people in the community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Abstract (Polish): Co roku na rynku pojawiają się nowe szkielety i biblioteki programistyczne starające się pozyskać zainteresowanie użytkownika prezentując swoje zalety nad konkurencją. Celem tego artykułu było porównanie wielu aspektów jednego z takich nowoczesnych rozwiązań, czyli biblioteki Solid.js oraz uznanego na rynku narzędzia, biblioteki React.js, by móc postawić opinię na temat lepszego wyboru dla programisty w 2024 roku. Analiza porównawcza została podzielona na dwie części - wydajnościową i teoretyczną. Badania wykazały przewagę Solid.js na polu wydajności, lecz podkreśliły również jej niedojrzały ekosystem i ograniczoną liczbę aktywnych osób w społeczności. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Computer Sciences Institute is the property of Lublin University of Technology and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Datenbank: Complementary Index
Beschreibung
Abstract:Every year, new frameworks and programming libraries appear on the market, trying to gain user interest by presenting their advantages over the competition. The purpose of this article was to compare many aspects of one if such modern solution, i.e. the Solid.js library with a tool recognized on the market, the React.js library, in order to be able to form an opinion on the better choice for a programmer in 2024. The comparative analysis was divided into two parts - performance and theoretical. The research showed Solid.js' performance advantage, but also highlighted its immature ecosystem and limited number of active people in the community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:25440764
DOI:10.35784/jcsi.6712