View in EDS

Large Language Models in Computer Science Classrooms: Ethical Challenges and Strategic Solutions.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Large Language Models in Computer Science Classrooms: Ethical Challenges and Strategic Solutions.
Authors: Azoulay, Rina, Hirst, Tirza, Reches, Shulamit
Source: Applied Sciences (2076-3417); Feb2025, Vol. 15 Issue 4, p1793, 58p
Subject Terms: LANGUAGE models, TECHNOLOGICAL innovations, COMPUTER science education, COMPUTER software developers, SCIENCE classrooms
Abstract: The integration of large language models (LLMs) into educational settings represents a significant technological breakthrough, offering substantial opportunities alongside profound ethical challenges. Higher education institutions face the widespread use of these tools by students, requiring them to navigate complex decisions regarding their adoption. This includes determining whether to allow the use of LLMs, defining their appropriate scope, and establishing guidelines for their responsible and ethical application. In the context of computer science education, these challenges are particularly acute. On the one hand, the capabilities of LLMs significantly enhance the tools available to developers and software engineers. On the other hand, students' over-reliance on LLMs risks hindering their development of foundational skills. This study examines these challenges and proposes strategies to regulate the use of LLMs while upholding academic integrity. It focuses on the specific impact of LLMs in programming education, where dependence on AI-generated solutions may erode active learning and essential skill acquisition. Through a comprehensive literature review and drawing on teaching experience and guidelines from global institutions, this study contributes to the broader discourse on the integration of these advanced technologies into educational environments. The goal is to enhance learning outcomes while ensuring the development of competent, ethical software professionals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Applied Sciences (2076-3417) is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Complementary Index
Description
Abstract:The integration of large language models (LLMs) into educational settings represents a significant technological breakthrough, offering substantial opportunities alongside profound ethical challenges. Higher education institutions face the widespread use of these tools by students, requiring them to navigate complex decisions regarding their adoption. This includes determining whether to allow the use of LLMs, defining their appropriate scope, and establishing guidelines for their responsible and ethical application. In the context of computer science education, these challenges are particularly acute. On the one hand, the capabilities of LLMs significantly enhance the tools available to developers and software engineers. On the other hand, students' over-reliance on LLMs risks hindering their development of foundational skills. This study examines these challenges and proposes strategies to regulate the use of LLMs while upholding academic integrity. It focuses on the specific impact of LLMs in programming education, where dependence on AI-generated solutions may erode active learning and essential skill acquisition. Through a comprehensive literature review and drawing on teaching experience and guidelines from global institutions, this study contributes to the broader discourse on the integration of these advanced technologies into educational environments. The goal is to enhance learning outcomes while ensuring the development of competent, ethical software professionals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:20763417
DOI:10.3390/app15041793