Zobrazit v EDS

The double connection: towards a bi-directional notion of participation.

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: The double connection: towards a bi-directional notion of participation.
Autoři: Devos, Tim, Boelens, Luuk
Zdroj: disP: The Planning Review; Mar2024, Vol. 60 Issue 1, p4-20, 17p
Témata: PARTICIPATION, MOTIVATION (Psychology)
Abstrakt: Self-organised initiatives are increasingly recognised as an alternative to the structural deficit of participatory planning approaches, both in theory and in practice. Nevertheless, public governance is struggling to find ways to deal with such initiatives. This article identifies four prominent categories of self-organised practice, analysing the main motivation to engage in and with these practices, from the perspective of government as well as the self-organised actors. This is in turn linked to three prominent theoretical answers on how governments might deal with self-organisation. Lastly, we reflect on the complexities of a possible double connection between policymakers and self-organisations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of disP: The Planning Review is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Databáze: Complementary Index
Popis
Abstrakt:Self-organised initiatives are increasingly recognised as an alternative to the structural deficit of participatory planning approaches, both in theory and in practice. Nevertheless, public governance is struggling to find ways to deal with such initiatives. This article identifies four prominent categories of self-organised practice, analysing the main motivation to engage in and with these practices, from the perspective of government as well as the self-organised actors. This is in turn linked to three prominent theoretical answers on how governments might deal with self-organisation. Lastly, we reflect on the complexities of a possible double connection between policymakers and self-organisations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:02513625
DOI:10.1080/02513625.2024.2376443