Podrobná bibliografia
| Názov: |
Revision/Conversion Surgeries After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass—An Experts' Modified Delphi Consensus. |
| Autori: |
Kermansaravi, Mohammad, Chiappetta, Sonja, Parmar, Chetan, Carbajo, Miguel A., Musella, Mario, Chevallier, Jean-Marc, Ribeiro, Rui, Ramos, Almino C., Weiner, Rudolf, Nimeri, Abdelrahman, Aarts, Edo, Abbas, Syed Imran, Bashir, Ahmad, Behrens, Estuardo, Billy, Helmuth, Cohen, Ricardo V., Caina, Daniel, De Luca, Maurizio, Dillemans, Bruno, Fobi, Mathias A. L. |
| Zdroj: |
Obesity Surgery; Jul2024, Vol. 34 Issue 7, p2399-2410, 12p |
| Predmety: |
DELPHI method, GASTRIC bypass, SURGICAL anastomosis, OBESITY complications, HIATAL hernia, WEIGHT gain |
| Abstrakt: |
Purpose: There is a lack of evidence for treatment of some conditions including complication management, suboptimal initial weight loss, recurrent weight gain, or worsening of a significant obesity complication after one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). This study was designed to respond to the existing lack of agreement and to provide a valuable resource for clinicians by employing an expert-modified Delphi consensus method. Methods: Forty-eight recognized bariatric surgeons from 28 countries participated in the modified Delphi consensus to vote on 64 statements in two rounds. An agreement/disagreement among ≥ 70.0% of the experts was regarded to indicate a consensus. Results: A consensus was achieved for 46 statements. For recurrent weight gain or worsening of a significant obesity complication after OAGB, more than 85% of experts reached a consensus that elongation of the biliopancreatic limb (BPL) is an acceptable option and the total bowel length measurement is mandatory during BPL elongation to preserve at least 300–400 cm of common channel limb length to avoid nutritional deficiencies. Also, more than 85% of experts reached a consensus on conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) with or without pouch downsizing as an acceptable option for the treatment of persistent bile reflux after OAGB and recommend detecting and repairing any size of hiatal hernia during conversion to RYGB. Conclusion: While the experts reached a consensus on several aspects regarding revision/conversion surgeries after OAGB, there are still lingering areas of disagreement. This highlights the importance of conducting further studies in the future to address these unresolved issues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Obesity Surgery is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Databáza: |
Complementary Index |