View in EDS

A systematic literature review on the applications of recurrent neural networks in code clone research.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A systematic literature review on the applications of recurrent neural networks in code clone research.
Authors: Quradaa, Fahmi H., Shahzad, Sara, Almoqbily, Rashad S.
Source: PLoS ONE; 2/2/2024, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p1-40, 40p
Subject Terms: RECURRENT neural networks, PLANT clones, NEURAL codes, LINEAR network coding, JAVA programming language, COMPUTER software quality control
Abstract: Code clones, referring to code fragments that are either similar or identical and are copied and pasted within software systems, have negative effects on both software quality and maintenance. The objective of this work is to systematically review and analyze recurrent neural network techniques used to detect code clones to shed light on the current techniques and offer valuable knowledge to the research community. Upon applying the review protocol, we have successfully identified 20 primary studies within this field from a total of 2099 studies. A deep investigation of these studies reveals that nine recurrent neural network techniques have been utilized for code clone detection, with a notable preference for LSTM techniques. These techniques have demonstrated their efficacy in detecting both syntactic and semantic clones, often utilizing abstract syntax trees for source code representation. Moreover, we observed that most studies applied evaluation metrics like F-score, precision, and recall. Additionally, these studies frequently utilized datasets extracted from open-source systems coded in Java and C programming languages. Notably, the Graph-LSTM technique exhibited superior performance. PyTorch and TensorFlow emerged as popular tools for implementing RNN models. To advance code clone detection research, further exploration of techniques like parallel LSTM, sentence-level LSTM, and Tree-Structured GRU is imperative. In addition, more research is needed to investigate the capabilities of the recurrent neural network techniques for identifying semantic clones across different programming languages and binary codes. The development of standardized benchmarks for languages like Python, Scratch, and C#, along with cross-language comparisons, is essential. Therefore, the utilization of recurrent neural network techniques for clone identification is a promising area that demands further research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of PLoS ONE is the property of Public Library of Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Complementary Index
Description
Abstract:Code clones, referring to code fragments that are either similar or identical and are copied and pasted within software systems, have negative effects on both software quality and maintenance. The objective of this work is to systematically review and analyze recurrent neural network techniques used to detect code clones to shed light on the current techniques and offer valuable knowledge to the research community. Upon applying the review protocol, we have successfully identified 20 primary studies within this field from a total of 2099 studies. A deep investigation of these studies reveals that nine recurrent neural network techniques have been utilized for code clone detection, with a notable preference for LSTM techniques. These techniques have demonstrated their efficacy in detecting both syntactic and semantic clones, often utilizing abstract syntax trees for source code representation. Moreover, we observed that most studies applied evaluation metrics like F-score, precision, and recall. Additionally, these studies frequently utilized datasets extracted from open-source systems coded in Java and C programming languages. Notably, the Graph-LSTM technique exhibited superior performance. PyTorch and TensorFlow emerged as popular tools for implementing RNN models. To advance code clone detection research, further exploration of techniques like parallel LSTM, sentence-level LSTM, and Tree-Structured GRU is imperative. In addition, more research is needed to investigate the capabilities of the recurrent neural network techniques for identifying semantic clones across different programming languages and binary codes. The development of standardized benchmarks for languages like Python, Scratch, and C#, along with cross-language comparisons, is essential. Therefore, the utilization of recurrent neural network techniques for clone identification is a promising area that demands further research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:19326203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0296858