Zobrazit v EDS

Unexpected events during survey design and trust in the police: a systematic review.

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: Unexpected events during survey design and trust in the police: a systematic review.
Autoři: Nägel, Christof, Nivette, Amy E.
Zdroj: Journal of Experimental Criminology; Dec2023, Vol. 19 Issue 4, p891-917, 27p
Témata: TRUST, PROCEDURAL justice, CAUSAL inference, POLICE, PUBLIC demonstrations
Abstrakt: Objectives: The current review has two aims: (1) to synthesize the impact of unexpected events on trust in police across different contexts and types of events, and (2) to evaluate the methodological characteristics of each study with attention to the assumptions for causal inference. Methods: We conducted a pre-registered narrative systematic review on 12 independent studies. Results: Studies closely adhering to causal inference assumption checks (i.e., excludability and ignorability) find significant changes in trust in police following incidents of police (non) violence and protest. Still, excludability is assessed and addressed less rigorously than ignorability in the included studies. Conclusion: Regarding the procedural justice framework, this provides some causal evidence that vicarious (positive and negative) experiences can shape short-term assessments of public trust in police. We furthermore highlight issues related to design and power, statistical conclusion validity, and the evaluation of assumptions to detect threats to internal validity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Experimental Criminology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Databáze: Complementary Index
Popis
Abstrakt:Objectives: The current review has two aims: (1) to synthesize the impact of unexpected events on trust in police across different contexts and types of events, and (2) to evaluate the methodological characteristics of each study with attention to the assumptions for causal inference. Methods: We conducted a pre-registered narrative systematic review on 12 independent studies. Results: Studies closely adhering to causal inference assumption checks (i.e., excludability and ignorability) find significant changes in trust in police following incidents of police (non) violence and protest. Still, excludability is assessed and addressed less rigorously than ignorability in the included studies. Conclusion: Regarding the procedural justice framework, this provides some causal evidence that vicarious (positive and negative) experiences can shape short-term assessments of public trust in police. We furthermore highlight issues related to design and power, statistical conclusion validity, and the evaluation of assumptions to detect threats to internal validity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:15733750
DOI:10.1007/s11292-022-09508-y